The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Farang Rak Tham ( talk · contribs) 07:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I'll do this review in a bit.--
Farang Rak Tham
(Talk)
07:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Before starting this review, I'd like to state that I have little knowledge on the subject, but I am fascinated by ancient cultures and beliefs.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 14:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I have assessed the article at B now.
I will continue with a detailed review per section. Feel free to insert replies or inquiries. To keep communication to the point, you might want to use templates like Done,
Doing...,
Not done,
Removed,
Added, and
Fixed. Please do not cross out my comments, as I will not yours but only my own. I will do the review of the lead mostly at the end.
by a traditional tabooCan we wikilink this?-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
including one occasion on which he killed a cinnamon bear.This appears less relevant.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
No comments.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
that scholars had over time criticized some of the emphasesPlease be a bit more specific, or raise an example of such an emphasis.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything significant you hadn't covered yet, though you might want to use the bit here on page 292. But it's not required.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 22:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Looks good. Pleased update the number of translations, and we're done.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 22:50, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I am passing for GA. I usually propose to help assessing the potential DYK, but you've probably got better people to help you with that.
Finally, if you are available, I'd appreciate it if you would want to take a look and possibly do a review of one of my GA nominations at
WP:GAN#REL. See you around.
--
Farang Rak Tham
(Talk)
23:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Farang Rak Tham ( talk · contribs) 07:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I'll do this review in a bit.--
Farang Rak Tham
(Talk)
07:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Before starting this review, I'd like to state that I have little knowledge on the subject, but I am fascinated by ancient cultures and beliefs.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 14:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I have assessed the article at B now.
I will continue with a detailed review per section. Feel free to insert replies or inquiries. To keep communication to the point, you might want to use templates like Done,
Doing...,
Not done,
Removed,
Added, and
Fixed. Please do not cross out my comments, as I will not yours but only my own. I will do the review of the lead mostly at the end.
by a traditional tabooCan we wikilink this?-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
including one occasion on which he killed a cinnamon bear.This appears less relevant.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
No comments.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
that scholars had over time criticized some of the emphasesPlease be a bit more specific, or raise an example of such an emphasis.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 23:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything significant you hadn't covered yet, though you might want to use the bit here on page 292. But it's not required.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 22:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Looks good. Pleased update the number of translations, and we're done.-- Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 22:50, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I am passing for GA. I usually propose to help assessing the potential DYK, but you've probably got better people to help you with that.
Finally, if you are available, I'd appreciate it if you would want to take a look and possibly do a review of one of my GA nominations at
WP:GAN#REL. See you around.
--
Farang Rak Tham
(Talk)
23:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|