![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Isaccea be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Romania may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
from what i know, Genucla is not identified. It could be everywhere on the Danube in northern Dobruja. Do you have any reference for this identification?
Ghirlandajo removed this:
with the comment:
Why Russophobic ? The Russian Army conquered the town, robbed it and set it on fire, destroying much of it. I have no doubts that most armies did pillaging of enemy towns in early 19th century. BTW, I read in a 1878 Romanian newspaper article that 65 villages of Northern part of the Dobruja were completely razed by the Russian Army during that war. bogdan 12:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
In early 13th century, the Genoese navigators built near Isaccea a port named "Vicina" and by the end of that century there was a flourishing community which lead by a consul and was under Byzantine jurisdiction. The area fell under rule of Theodore Svetoslav (1300–1321) who took the control over all Dobruja, however the Genoese refused to continue trade under Bulgarian rule, because of the customs they'd have to pay when trading with the Byzantine Empire. After his death, the Tatars gained its control. [1]
However by 1331/1332, Vicina was again under Byzantine rule and in 1337/1338, it was occupied by the Tatars. The Metropolitan of Vicina, Makarios, however promised to the Patriarch of Constantinople that he would flee even though they were under pagan rule. The Genoese did not flee either, but soon the town's importance faded. [2]
(apparently, Vicina was not the same thing as Isaccea)
In this impressive article that I am translating into Norwegian, it is said about Vlad Tepes:
In a letter to Corvinus, dated February 11, 1462, he stated:
You have to apologize my ignorance, but which Corvinus are we talking about? My wife and I cycling along the Danube will visit Isaccea this spring. Hopefully we will be able to take some pictures of the place with a magnificant history. Trygve W Nodeland ( talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
The city wasn't renamed by the Romans. The Romans just took the local Celtic name, which in the Celtic language was something like "Noviodunon", and adapted it to their language. The reference doesn't say anywhere the word "renamed".
Saying that it was renamed is as absurd as saying that the city of Prague was renamed to "Prag" by the Germans during WWII. bogdan ( talk) 21:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Isaccea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Isaccea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.tulcea.insse.ro/phpfiles/ComunicatPresaDateProvizoriiRPL2011Tulcea.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.adevarul.ro/articole/2007/de-la-rusi-vine-curentul-ieftin.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Isaccea be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Romania may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
from what i know, Genucla is not identified. It could be everywhere on the Danube in northern Dobruja. Do you have any reference for this identification?
Ghirlandajo removed this:
with the comment:
Why Russophobic ? The Russian Army conquered the town, robbed it and set it on fire, destroying much of it. I have no doubts that most armies did pillaging of enemy towns in early 19th century. BTW, I read in a 1878 Romanian newspaper article that 65 villages of Northern part of the Dobruja were completely razed by the Russian Army during that war. bogdan 12:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
In early 13th century, the Genoese navigators built near Isaccea a port named "Vicina" and by the end of that century there was a flourishing community which lead by a consul and was under Byzantine jurisdiction. The area fell under rule of Theodore Svetoslav (1300–1321) who took the control over all Dobruja, however the Genoese refused to continue trade under Bulgarian rule, because of the customs they'd have to pay when trading with the Byzantine Empire. After his death, the Tatars gained its control. [1]
However by 1331/1332, Vicina was again under Byzantine rule and in 1337/1338, it was occupied by the Tatars. The Metropolitan of Vicina, Makarios, however promised to the Patriarch of Constantinople that he would flee even though they were under pagan rule. The Genoese did not flee either, but soon the town's importance faded. [2]
(apparently, Vicina was not the same thing as Isaccea)
In this impressive article that I am translating into Norwegian, it is said about Vlad Tepes:
In a letter to Corvinus, dated February 11, 1462, he stated:
You have to apologize my ignorance, but which Corvinus are we talking about? My wife and I cycling along the Danube will visit Isaccea this spring. Hopefully we will be able to take some pictures of the place with a magnificant history. Trygve W Nodeland ( talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
The city wasn't renamed by the Romans. The Romans just took the local Celtic name, which in the Celtic language was something like "Noviodunon", and adapted it to their language. The reference doesn't say anywhere the word "renamed".
Saying that it was renamed is as absurd as saying that the city of Prague was renamed to "Prag" by the Germans during WWII. bogdan ( talk) 21:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Isaccea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Isaccea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.tulcea.insse.ro/phpfiles/ComunicatPresaDateProvizoriiRPL2011Tulcea.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.adevarul.ro/articole/2007/de-la-rusi-vine-curentul-ieftin.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC)