Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

   Article is well written and complies to MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

   References appear to comply with WP:RS and statements are properly supported.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Image is properly tagged.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: S Masters ( talk) 15:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Summary: Everything checks out; however, I am happy to approve this as a Good Article.