 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
I don't think Long "intrigued" against Home Rule, as he was very open in his opposition to it. 86.42.199.103 ( talk) 12:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the point you make. I have replaced intrigued with conspired. It you have a better phrase then please propose it, or simply re-edit in the article. From what I have gathered, he was not just simply openly against Home Rule, but he also worked and pulled strings in the background to condsiderably undermine it. Osioni ( talk) 16:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
This whole article is written as a lament from the point of view of someone who regarded a very limited version of Home Rule as a full andfair settlement of the Irish question. As such it is an opinion piece and exhibits fatal levels of bias. 2405:4803:C81D:74D0:469B:B13:CABF:661A ( talk) 17:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your special contribution. Yes, it is a record of events as they happened, a fatal path for the better.... History is as history was, regrettably, gladly or otherwise. Osioni ( talk)
While many might agree with some of the editorializing in this article, it is not encyclopedic and should be amended. Straw Cat ( talk) 17:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- The article has been almost entirely stable since 2011. There might be the odd phrase here or there, probably unconscious, but I really don't see anything non-neutral in the general tone of the article. Tagging it gives a very false impression. Paulturtle ( talk) 00:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I don't think Long "intrigued" against Home Rule, as he was very open in his opposition to it. 86.42.199.103 ( talk) 12:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the point you make. I have replaced intrigued with conspired. It you have a better phrase then please propose it, or simply re-edit in the article. From what I have gathered, he was not just simply openly against Home Rule, but he also worked and pulled strings in the background to condsiderably undermine it. Osioni ( talk) 16:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
This whole article is written as a lament from the point of view of someone who regarded a very limited version of Home Rule as a full andfair settlement of the Irish question. As such it is an opinion piece and exhibits fatal levels of bias. 2405:4803:C81D:74D0:469B:B13:CABF:661A ( talk) 17:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your special contribution. Yes, it is a record of events as they happened, a fatal path for the better.... History is as history was, regrettably, gladly or otherwise. Osioni ( talk)
While many might agree with some of the editorializing in this article, it is not encyclopedic and should be amended. Straw Cat ( talk) 17:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- The article has been almost entirely stable since 2011. There might be the odd phrase here or there, probably unconscious, but I really don't see anything non-neutral in the general tone of the article. Tagging it gives a very false impression. Paulturtle ( talk) 00:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)