![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is a form of synthesis, which is an unacceptable form of original research.
It conflates a set of bilateral technical arrangements (Ireland-IoM, Ireland-Gy, Ireland-Je) into a broader phenomenon of multilateral relations, without any evidence to support this claim. The fact that 3 similar things exist does bot mean that all three are a notable topic, unless there is external evidence of the notability of the combined topic.
The creation of this appears to be WP:POINTy response to the objections to the objections to the same editor's creation of contested British Isles categories. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) ⢠( contribs) 14:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
(note: at this point, the article was moved to Ireland-Isle of Man relations to address the WP:SYN accusation.
BHG, if you're so concerned about this article, rather than spending time on the talk page, I suggest that you spend some time improving the article. Your help in improving this particular article is most welcome, even if for some reason the very idea of it bothers you. I think one area in particular that can be filled out further is the question of economic/banking relationships; how much trade is there between the Ireland/Isle of Man, what sort of issues do the offshore banks cause, etc. I'm sure with your formidable research skills you could be doing something a lot more useful than taking potshots at articles that are in their early phases of development. -- KarlB ( talk) 19:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
I have removed this article from Category:Politics of the British Isles, because this articles is not about politics; it is about the bilateral inter-governmental relations between a state and another (quasi-)state, which is a matter of international relations.
If you look at other similar articles, such as those in âšThe template Category link is being considered for merging.âşÂ Category:Bilateral relations of Germany, they are categorised as bilateral relations rather than as politics. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) ⢠( contribs) 14:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IrelandâIsle of Man relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is a form of synthesis, which is an unacceptable form of original research.
It conflates a set of bilateral technical arrangements (Ireland-IoM, Ireland-Gy, Ireland-Je) into a broader phenomenon of multilateral relations, without any evidence to support this claim. The fact that 3 similar things exist does bot mean that all three are a notable topic, unless there is external evidence of the notability of the combined topic.
The creation of this appears to be WP:POINTy response to the objections to the objections to the same editor's creation of contested British Isles categories. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) ⢠( contribs) 14:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
(note: at this point, the article was moved to Ireland-Isle of Man relations to address the WP:SYN accusation.
BHG, if you're so concerned about this article, rather than spending time on the talk page, I suggest that you spend some time improving the article. Your help in improving this particular article is most welcome, even if for some reason the very idea of it bothers you. I think one area in particular that can be filled out further is the question of economic/banking relationships; how much trade is there between the Ireland/Isle of Man, what sort of issues do the offshore banks cause, etc. I'm sure with your formidable research skills you could be doing something a lot more useful than taking potshots at articles that are in their early phases of development. -- KarlB ( talk) 19:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
I have removed this article from Category:Politics of the British Isles, because this articles is not about politics; it is about the bilateral inter-governmental relations between a state and another (quasi-)state, which is a matter of international relations.
If you look at other similar articles, such as those in âšThe template Category link is being considered for merging.âşÂ Category:Bilateral relations of Germany, they are categorised as bilateral relations rather than as politics. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) ⢠( contribs) 14:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IrelandâIsle of Man relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)