![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I think the phrase
is redundant, and not very clear, ( IMHO):
But as I already did some "cutting", I'll leave it for the moment... MFH 15:17, 5 April 2005 (UTC)
Instead of considered first the most common uses of "inverse element", the article focuses to the widest generalizations of the concept, which are rarely considered outside the advanced study of pure algebraic structures. It results the article is not only too WP:TECHNICAL, but readers, specially those who come here through one of the many links to Invertible, do not find here what they are looking for.
I have recently rewritten the lead for summarizing what should be in this article and providing the basic information to the readers, and I'll start to rewrite the body of the article. However, this is not my highest priority, so it is possible that the article will have a strange structure for some time. D.Lazard ( talk) 10:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Invertible element and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10 § Invertible element until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Jay
💬
16:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I think the phrase
is redundant, and not very clear, ( IMHO):
But as I already did some "cutting", I'll leave it for the moment... MFH 15:17, 5 April 2005 (UTC)
Instead of considered first the most common uses of "inverse element", the article focuses to the widest generalizations of the concept, which are rarely considered outside the advanced study of pure algebraic structures. It results the article is not only too WP:TECHNICAL, but readers, specially those who come here through one of the many links to Invertible, do not find here what they are looking for.
I have recently rewritten the lead for summarizing what should be in this article and providing the basic information to the readers, and I'll start to rewrite the body of the article. However, this is not my highest priority, so it is possible that the article will have a strange structure for some time. D.Lazard ( talk) 10:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Invertible element and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10 § Invertible element until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Jay
💬
16:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)