This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
See archived discussion at Talk:Inverse (logic)/Archive
The article read,
This is a poor example, because to suggest that they will attend the movies no matter the weather makes the "if it's raining" clause irrelevant and arguably misleading. No one would include that clause if they intend to attend no matter the weather.
Explaining that the inference is not valid because additional conditions might be imposed on the "not raining" case – as I just did – is a much better example. Novel compound ( talk) 17:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
See archived discussion at Talk:Inverse (logic)/Archive
The article read,
This is a poor example, because to suggest that they will attend the movies no matter the weather makes the "if it's raining" clause irrelevant and arguably misleading. No one would include that clause if they intend to attend no matter the weather.
Explaining that the inference is not valid because additional conditions might be imposed on the "not raining" case – as I just did – is a much better example. Novel compound ( talk) 17:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)