The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved per discussion. - GTBacchus^{( talk)} 21:36, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Inventory Information Approval System → Inventory information approval system – Relisted. Vegaswikian ( talk) 22:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 08:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC) reply

• Oppose. The sources I've seen predominantly capitalize this one. Dohn joe ( talk) 18:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC) reply
• Comment, leaning oppose. As Dohn says, the sources almost universally capitalise this and it is the Inventory Information Approval System. I think there's a good chance it's a proper noun. Jenks24 ( talk) 01:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply

So there's only one system, and it's "owned" by a person or company? It would be nice if the article said when it was developed, to pin it down as a proprietary thing. At least it gives the country, buried at the end of the opening sentence. I'd assumed there'd be more than one system for approving inventory information (in the world, even in the US). Tony (talk) 04:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.