![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 4 May 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
AsteforiiAlbicans.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
See discussion at Talk:Genetic pollution. The present, short article is an attempt to make a serious discussion. Genetic pollution is much longer but a load of opinionated, crappy, disgraceful and ugly bullshit. And this is a Very Bad Thing, because the phenomenon is real and known to be (at least in some cases) a problem requiring human intervention. Having knee-jerk shitty articles is a disservice. Dysmorodrepanis 15:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Is it normal usage to have an article with "introgression"? I see "the introgression" several times. And "the simple hybridization" sounds even stranger to my ears. 174.70.58.119 ( talk) 07:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC)jamie
I have made an initial assessment of quality and importance. This is an important topic in genetics, and is about to become even more important because evidence now suggests that it happens more than we previously thought. The topic is poorly served by the article. There is confusion with citations on Introgression and citations on Hybridisation - they are not the same thing. William Harris • talk • 03:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Heya! I'm currently working on an updated version of the Introgression article, including some graphics and improvements to the wording. As it stands, this article is rated pretty low on the quality scale, and I am working on it as a part of a WikiCourse for a college class. Please keep in mind, I am relatively new to this process, and may make mistakes. I do hope to signifcantly improve this article for public use, and you can see a live version of the update process on a specially made sandbox page under my account, at Sandbox:Introgression. Please leave any suggestions under the talk section, and do not edit the page itself. I appreciate feedback, and hope to meet the standards of Wikipedia by the end.
Thank you, AsteforiiAlbicans ( talk) 23:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Update
I've made my changes to the article--including two photos, and I've reduced the plagiarism that was present in two places. Please note, I wasn't able to fully fix the definition section because I could never find another way to state the information without losing quality, so I would welcome any recommendations for that. In all other ways, this should be my final draft.
Lineage fusion was a very important addition in my opinion, as it is a high-impact event that has happened historically.
Thank you, AsteforiiAlbicans ( talk) 01:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 4 May 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
AsteforiiAlbicans.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
See discussion at Talk:Genetic pollution. The present, short article is an attempt to make a serious discussion. Genetic pollution is much longer but a load of opinionated, crappy, disgraceful and ugly bullshit. And this is a Very Bad Thing, because the phenomenon is real and known to be (at least in some cases) a problem requiring human intervention. Having knee-jerk shitty articles is a disservice. Dysmorodrepanis 15:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Is it normal usage to have an article with "introgression"? I see "the introgression" several times. And "the simple hybridization" sounds even stranger to my ears. 174.70.58.119 ( talk) 07:34, 22 May 2010 (UTC)jamie
I have made an initial assessment of quality and importance. This is an important topic in genetics, and is about to become even more important because evidence now suggests that it happens more than we previously thought. The topic is poorly served by the article. There is confusion with citations on Introgression and citations on Hybridisation - they are not the same thing. William Harris • talk • 03:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Heya! I'm currently working on an updated version of the Introgression article, including some graphics and improvements to the wording. As it stands, this article is rated pretty low on the quality scale, and I am working on it as a part of a WikiCourse for a college class. Please keep in mind, I am relatively new to this process, and may make mistakes. I do hope to signifcantly improve this article for public use, and you can see a live version of the update process on a specially made sandbox page under my account, at Sandbox:Introgression. Please leave any suggestions under the talk section, and do not edit the page itself. I appreciate feedback, and hope to meet the standards of Wikipedia by the end.
Thank you, AsteforiiAlbicans ( talk) 23:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Update
I've made my changes to the article--including two photos, and I've reduced the plagiarism that was present in two places. Please note, I wasn't able to fully fix the definition section because I could never find another way to state the information without losing quality, so I would welcome any recommendations for that. In all other ways, this should be my final draft.
Lineage fusion was a very important addition in my opinion, as it is a high-impact event that has happened historically.
Thank you, AsteforiiAlbicans ( talk) 01:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)