This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Into the Wild (novel) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Into the Wild (novel) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The official Warriors website uses that image featured in the center of the cover as their picture of Firestar. So we actually have proof for this one. -- ~|ET|~( Talk| Contribs) 01:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
This page is considered a content guideline on Wikipedia. It is generally accepted among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this page's talk page. Common sense says that the cats are the same D A V I D C A T 23:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Where it talks about the prolouge and mentions the prophecy it says that 'this fire turns out to be Rusty, a housecat' I really see no point in that being there because 1) Nowhere in the first book does anyone come out and say that Rusty/Firepaw is the fire that will save their clan. 2) Even Bluestar isn't sure of the fact 3) It doesn't even MENTION Rusty in the prolouge amd 4) It should be obvious to the reader anyway. I removed that line. If anyone has objections we can talk it out and put it back in, possibly in a different spot.
Image:Warriorsbook1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I rewrote the article to give it more encyclopedic value. Please remember that this article is meant to present the book mainly to people who never heard about it before. Consequently, there is no need to enumerate dozens of names, to present the plot in an in-universe style, to present non-relevant details, and to use words and expressions that are not understood by those who did not read the books. Remember, the article was nominated for deletion because of these flaws. Yrtgm ( talk) 16:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I am failing this article because I believe it neither meets the Good Article criteria nor is sufficiently close to be brought in line via trivial improvements. Among my issues with the current article are the following:
Once these issues are cleared up, feel free to nominate the page once more. Good luck! -- erachima talk 07:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
I found a lot of issues in
Into the Wild that I never expected! O well I'll try to fix it...one more thing on my list of stuff to do...*sigh*
Melkittycat (
talk)
03:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Maybe the summary should be shortened a little because it feels like i'm reading the book right here, or maybe it doesn't need to be???? Aqualover ( talk) 02:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 09:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Overall, the article is well researched and answers the sorts of questions readers may ask. Here are a few concerns I have however:
Lead:
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼ 18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
I'll return to continue the review!
Susanne2009NYC (
talk)
17:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
More on the Lead:
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
22:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
22:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, I usually format the lead as: Date published, author, plot, and then a summary of the rest of the article going straight down so it would be, origins, pub history themes, reviews and then awards so I'll put the themes above the reviews part.
More on the Lead:
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done Well, when you put it like that it makes sense ;)
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
When these adjustments are made, we'll move into the main text! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 01:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I shall return! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 03:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done Can't believe I did that!
Derild
49
21
☼
22:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I'll return to review the first section! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 21:23, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I'll return later! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 23:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
00:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Later! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 00:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Done, should the section be made into a subsection of critical reception?
Derild
49
21
☼
02:01, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Done though the first paragraph looks really out of place now...
Derild
49
21
☼
00:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done though I had to cut out the details for a battle to keep the paragraph short.
Derild
49
21
☼
23:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
15:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and (c) it contains no original research.
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Upon request, I am going to peer review this article, I will leave points which I think need to be polished below, Sadads ( talk) 00:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Is ""booksforyouth Review". booksforyouth.com. Retrieved 2010-07-20." A reliable source? It just looks like a blog to me, Sadads ( talk) 00:36, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
I think this section could go a little deeper into the intricacy of each review. It has a very surface level approach right now, with each review pretty much giving a thumbs up or a thumbs down, or so it seems, Sadads ( talk) 00:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Before you go to another review, I would get the lead within standards for WP:Lead, especially number of paragraphs to content ratio, Sadads ( talk) 00:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
"The genre is fantasy though there are also human elements and themes within the book."
I was somewhat confused by that sentence. This seems to suggest that human elements and themes aren't common in fantasy. Instead of "the genre is fantasy," I think that a statement about the creatures might make for a better comparison. -- James26 ( talk) 11:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
At long last, I am posting my review! You said that you were thinking of submitting this article for FAC. I think the two biggest issues that it faces are "brilliant prose" and "high-quality sources".
I hope this helps! Awadewit ( talk) 17:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I reviewed this article for GA and now notice the prose has been tweaked and new material entered. I suggest the article be sent to Reassessment before FAC is considered, or a copy editor be allowed to touch up the prose. I see other problems. For example, we're told the book has been described as "Shakespearean" but this is not developed other than listing some themes the book shares with the bard's plays such as war and star-crossed lovers. Listing themes and moving on to something else is not enough at FAC. There appears to be no reliable sources (read scholarly literature) that delve into this book with a thorough examination of its themes. This is the weakest part of the article and probably won't help at FAC. Themes is the meat and potatoes of an article about a work of fiction and other than the themes being listed here, there's no examination of them. At this point however, the article could be improved with a thorough copy edit. Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 21:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
"The novel has been translated into 20 different languages including German, Britain, France, Russia, Japan, Korea, China, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Portugal, Hungary, Brazil, Norway and Greece."
FWIW, "Britain, France, Russia, Japan, Korea, China, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Portugal, Hungary, Brazil, Norway and Greece" are not languages. Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 03:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
We should remove all that junk about where it takes place, (it's on the image anyway) and expand the plot. We also don't need a whole paragragh about the prolauge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.182.93 ( talk) 23:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
But about the setting. Why couldn't we split it into a sub-section in the plot? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.182.93 ( talk) 04:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
The Article states that's it's available in e-book and amazon kindle formats.The Kindle is an e-reader though.So should it just say e-book format?-- Nyswimmer ( talk) 12:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
This is Nyswimmer sorry I forgot to sign before -- Nyswimmer ( talk) 12:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC) 23:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Into the Wild (novel). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
The plot section has no mention of Yellowfang or the supposed connection between her disappearance and the missing kits. I think the plot section should be redone to show that. Jak474 ( talk) 16:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Into the Wild (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Into the Wild (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Does "kits" refer to kittens? It's an odd word choice – probably used in the book but perhaps not interpretable by Wikipedia readers. — BarrelProof ( talk) 22:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
I believe there are a few missing details about Yellowfang's involvement and introduction to the clan as well as Firepaw and Graypaw becoming Fireheart and Graystripe at the end of the book. Ruin0517 ( talk) 11:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Into the Wild (novel) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Into the Wild (novel) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The official Warriors website uses that image featured in the center of the cover as their picture of Firestar. So we actually have proof for this one. -- ~|ET|~( Talk| Contribs) 01:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
This page is considered a content guideline on Wikipedia. It is generally accepted among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this page's talk page. Common sense says that the cats are the same D A V I D C A T 23:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Where it talks about the prolouge and mentions the prophecy it says that 'this fire turns out to be Rusty, a housecat' I really see no point in that being there because 1) Nowhere in the first book does anyone come out and say that Rusty/Firepaw is the fire that will save their clan. 2) Even Bluestar isn't sure of the fact 3) It doesn't even MENTION Rusty in the prolouge amd 4) It should be obvious to the reader anyway. I removed that line. If anyone has objections we can talk it out and put it back in, possibly in a different spot.
Image:Warriorsbook1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I rewrote the article to give it more encyclopedic value. Please remember that this article is meant to present the book mainly to people who never heard about it before. Consequently, there is no need to enumerate dozens of names, to present the plot in an in-universe style, to present non-relevant details, and to use words and expressions that are not understood by those who did not read the books. Remember, the article was nominated for deletion because of these flaws. Yrtgm ( talk) 16:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I am failing this article because I believe it neither meets the Good Article criteria nor is sufficiently close to be brought in line via trivial improvements. Among my issues with the current article are the following:
Once these issues are cleared up, feel free to nominate the page once more. Good luck! -- erachima talk 07:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
I found a lot of issues in
Into the Wild that I never expected! O well I'll try to fix it...one more thing on my list of stuff to do...*sigh*
Melkittycat (
talk)
03:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Maybe the summary should be shortened a little because it feels like i'm reading the book right here, or maybe it doesn't need to be???? Aqualover ( talk) 02:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 09:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Overall, the article is well researched and answers the sorts of questions readers may ask. Here are a few concerns I have however:
Lead:
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼ 18:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
I'll return to continue the review!
Susanne2009NYC (
talk)
17:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
More on the Lead:
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
22:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
22:44, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, I usually format the lead as: Date published, author, plot, and then a summary of the rest of the article going straight down so it would be, origins, pub history themes, reviews and then awards so I'll put the themes above the reviews part.
More on the Lead:
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done Well, when you put it like that it makes sense ;)
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
01:17, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
When these adjustments are made, we'll move into the main text! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 01:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I shall return! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 03:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done Can't believe I did that!
Derild
49
21
☼
22:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I'll return to review the first section! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 21:23, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
I'll return later! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 23:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
00:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Later! Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 00:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Done, should the section be made into a subsection of critical reception?
Derild
49
21
☼
02:01, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Done though the first paragraph looks really out of place now...
Derild
49
21
☼
00:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
13:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done though I had to cut out the details for a battle to keep the paragraph short.
Derild
49
21
☼
23:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Done
Derild
49
21
☼
15:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and (c) it contains no original research.
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Upon request, I am going to peer review this article, I will leave points which I think need to be polished below, Sadads ( talk) 00:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Is ""booksforyouth Review". booksforyouth.com. Retrieved 2010-07-20." A reliable source? It just looks like a blog to me, Sadads ( talk) 00:36, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
I think this section could go a little deeper into the intricacy of each review. It has a very surface level approach right now, with each review pretty much giving a thumbs up or a thumbs down, or so it seems, Sadads ( talk) 00:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Before you go to another review, I would get the lead within standards for WP:Lead, especially number of paragraphs to content ratio, Sadads ( talk) 00:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
"The genre is fantasy though there are also human elements and themes within the book."
I was somewhat confused by that sentence. This seems to suggest that human elements and themes aren't common in fantasy. Instead of "the genre is fantasy," I think that a statement about the creatures might make for a better comparison. -- James26 ( talk) 11:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
At long last, I am posting my review! You said that you were thinking of submitting this article for FAC. I think the two biggest issues that it faces are "brilliant prose" and "high-quality sources".
I hope this helps! Awadewit ( talk) 17:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I reviewed this article for GA and now notice the prose has been tweaked and new material entered. I suggest the article be sent to Reassessment before FAC is considered, or a copy editor be allowed to touch up the prose. I see other problems. For example, we're told the book has been described as "Shakespearean" but this is not developed other than listing some themes the book shares with the bard's plays such as war and star-crossed lovers. Listing themes and moving on to something else is not enough at FAC. There appears to be no reliable sources (read scholarly literature) that delve into this book with a thorough examination of its themes. This is the weakest part of the article and probably won't help at FAC. Themes is the meat and potatoes of an article about a work of fiction and other than the themes being listed here, there's no examination of them. At this point however, the article could be improved with a thorough copy edit. Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 21:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
"The novel has been translated into 20 different languages including German, Britain, France, Russia, Japan, Korea, China, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Portugal, Hungary, Brazil, Norway and Greece."
FWIW, "Britain, France, Russia, Japan, Korea, China, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Portugal, Hungary, Brazil, Norway and Greece" are not languages. Susanne2009NYC ( talk) 03:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
We should remove all that junk about where it takes place, (it's on the image anyway) and expand the plot. We also don't need a whole paragragh about the prolauge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.182.93 ( talk) 23:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
But about the setting. Why couldn't we split it into a sub-section in the plot? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.182.93 ( talk) 04:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
The Article states that's it's available in e-book and amazon kindle formats.The Kindle is an e-reader though.So should it just say e-book format?-- Nyswimmer ( talk) 12:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
This is Nyswimmer sorry I forgot to sign before -- Nyswimmer ( talk) 12:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC) 23:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Into the Wild (novel). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
The plot section has no mention of Yellowfang or the supposed connection between her disappearance and the missing kits. I think the plot section should be redone to show that. Jak474 ( talk) 16:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Into the Wild (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Into the Wild (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Does "kits" refer to kittens? It's an odd word choice – probably used in the book but perhaps not interpretable by Wikipedia readers. — BarrelProof ( talk) 22:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
I believe there are a few missing details about Yellowfang's involvement and introduction to the clan as well as Firepaw and Graypaw becoming Fireheart and Graystripe at the end of the book. Ruin0517 ( talk) 11:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)