This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interstate 88 (New York) was previously a
U.S. Roads Article Improvement Drive collaboration. For more details, see the U.S. Roads Article Improvement Drive. |
To-do list for Interstate 88 (New York):
|
There's no talk about I-88's original planned routing from Albany to Portsmouth, NH. I'll put it in later, provided I can find a reference. -- Tckma 18:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
This should be renamed I-88 in New York and the other I-88 in Illionis. The designator (east) and (west) implies that this is part of the label when it's not. Both roads are simply named I-88. 99.149.197.13 ( talk) 05:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Kia Sue
Somehow, there should be mention of the other I88 in IL. If you don't read the tiny mention on one of the other pages, or go through the dab page, you may never know it really exists. Remember, people are idiots. Even with (west) and (east), people may not notice. Otherwise, there should be a link to a separate page or at least the information in the one article about these discontinuous numbers. Andyross ( talk) 16:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted TMP's edit to restore the link for the time being. If a consensus feels that a for link should not be placed or a Wikipedia policy states it should not be used, I will remove it. These types of links appear on many pages in the name of helping users and they take nothing away from its quality of information. On another note, I agree with Davemeistermoa; a addition to the intro would be the best way to disclose this. (See Interstate 86 (east) for an example of similar tagging) Thank you, Coopman86 ( talk) 05:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
And it was added again today. – T M F 18:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Why exactly is the picture designated as "incorrect I-88 signage?" what is incorrect about it? I live in Binghamton and have seen the sign. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.86.127 ( talk) 14:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to move this to "Interstate 88 (New York)" to avoid confusion with the eastbound and westbound directions on the highway. Same with Interstate 88 (west). Listroiderbob talk 'tribs ▆ 18:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Consensus should not be based on numbers. The general consensus should be based on opinion and the strength of the opinions. Mitch32( Wikipedia's worst Reform Luddite.) 16:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
(see section above this) Should this article should be moved to "Interstate 88 (New York)" for precision and clarity? This would most likely cause the numerous other articles with the same naming convention to be moved as well (this is explained above). Listroiderbob talk edits more 02:57, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate 88 (New York). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/pdf/BPR_pdf_files/Maps/Statewide/Historic_OTMs/1989fr.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/highway-data-services/inventory-listingWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate 88 (New York). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interstate 88 (New York) was previously a
U.S. Roads Article Improvement Drive collaboration. For more details, see the U.S. Roads Article Improvement Drive. |
To-do list for Interstate 88 (New York):
|
There's no talk about I-88's original planned routing from Albany to Portsmouth, NH. I'll put it in later, provided I can find a reference. -- Tckma 18:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
This should be renamed I-88 in New York and the other I-88 in Illionis. The designator (east) and (west) implies that this is part of the label when it's not. Both roads are simply named I-88. 99.149.197.13 ( talk) 05:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Kia Sue
Somehow, there should be mention of the other I88 in IL. If you don't read the tiny mention on one of the other pages, or go through the dab page, you may never know it really exists. Remember, people are idiots. Even with (west) and (east), people may not notice. Otherwise, there should be a link to a separate page or at least the information in the one article about these discontinuous numbers. Andyross ( talk) 16:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted TMP's edit to restore the link for the time being. If a consensus feels that a for link should not be placed or a Wikipedia policy states it should not be used, I will remove it. These types of links appear on many pages in the name of helping users and they take nothing away from its quality of information. On another note, I agree with Davemeistermoa; a addition to the intro would be the best way to disclose this. (See Interstate 86 (east) for an example of similar tagging) Thank you, Coopman86 ( talk) 05:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
And it was added again today. – T M F 18:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Why exactly is the picture designated as "incorrect I-88 signage?" what is incorrect about it? I live in Binghamton and have seen the sign. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.86.127 ( talk) 14:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to move this to "Interstate 88 (New York)" to avoid confusion with the eastbound and westbound directions on the highway. Same with Interstate 88 (west). Listroiderbob talk 'tribs ▆ 18:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Consensus should not be based on numbers. The general consensus should be based on opinion and the strength of the opinions. Mitch32( Wikipedia's worst Reform Luddite.) 16:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
(see section above this) Should this article should be moved to "Interstate 88 (New York)" for precision and clarity? This would most likely cause the numerous other articles with the same naming convention to be moved as well (this is explained above). Listroiderbob talk edits more 02:57, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate 88 (New York). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/pdf/BPR_pdf_files/Maps/Statewide/Historic_OTMs/1989fr.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/highway-data-services/inventory-listingWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate 88 (New York). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)