This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Internet censorship in Australia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Internet censorship in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I am removing the unsourced list of discouraged pros and cons. It only ever reached the stage of a proposal for a trial and was widely dismissed by industry. I don't believe its likely to return as a political issue. There have been no sources added in more than three years. I would support that content being re-added as prose with sources if it is integrated into the rest of the text and relevance has been demonstrated. - Shiftchange ( talk) 15:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Internet censorship in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 24 external links on Internet censorship in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/441505/government_gives_up_plan_internet_filter/?fp=16&fpid=1{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/21628/53/1/0/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
The 2 September 2020 arrest is certainly a noteworthy event, but does it actually belong on this page? It's not really Internet censorship like the other topics in this section. Where would be a better page for it to go? peterl ( talk) 05:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
As an Aussie I can confirm that Telstra also blocked Archive.today. That site, along with 4chan and presumably Voat as mentioned in the article, were blocked until a "routine" revision in September IIRC. Some sites remained blocked after that, I think. Unfortunately, I don't have a source right now. Wiimeiser ( talk) 09:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Internet censorship in Australia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Internet censorship in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I am removing the unsourced list of discouraged pros and cons. It only ever reached the stage of a proposal for a trial and was widely dismissed by industry. I don't believe its likely to return as a political issue. There have been no sources added in more than three years. I would support that content being re-added as prose with sources if it is integrated into the rest of the text and relevance has been demonstrated. - Shiftchange ( talk) 15:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Internet censorship in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 24 external links on Internet censorship in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/441505/government_gives_up_plan_internet_filter/?fp=16&fpid=1{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/21628/53/1/0/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
The 2 September 2020 arrest is certainly a noteworthy event, but does it actually belong on this page? It's not really Internet censorship like the other topics in this section. Where would be a better page for it to go? peterl ( talk) 05:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
As an Aussie I can confirm that Telstra also blocked Archive.today. That site, along with 4chan and presumably Voat as mentioned in the article, were blocked until a "routine" revision in September IIRC. Some sites remained blocked after that, I think. Unfortunately, I don't have a source right now. Wiimeiser ( talk) 09:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)