This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International recognition of the State of Palestine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Palestine High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Limited recognition Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Further information The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are: Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required. With respect to the WP:1RR restriction: Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence. After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions. Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of International recognition of the State of Palestine was copied or moved into Palestine 194 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Quite clearly: https://x.com/mzez_rs/status/1798081688343548163?s=48&t=kJLyaI6hau_cAdPQ04TQfQ 2A00:A041:3B9A:AC00:D172:9D2:443E:61B ( talk) 20:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Yep Slovenia becomes 4th European country to recognize Palestinian state after parliamentary vote Selfstudier ( talk) 20:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The reference used in the article even mentions that the parliamentary approved proposal needs to be approved by the government - thus not final [1]. Semsûrî ( talk) 20:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Other way around, already approved subject to a parliamentary vote. So, yes, it is final. Selfstudier ( talk) 20:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Well, self-revert it is. Semsûrî ( talk) 20:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Just checking that after all the conversations and goings on, we have settled at 144. All agree? Selfstudier ( talk) 11:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Plan B - "or thereabouts" is currently used in 335 Wikipedia articles. Sean.hoyland ( talk) 13:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Lol. Selfstudier ( talk) 13:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Armenia has just recognized Palestine: https://www.mfa.am/hy/interviews-articles-and-comments/2024/06/21/mfa_statement/12706 (also, in the section about Japan the word Palestinian is misspelled as “Palestianian”) 2A02:14F:1F2:F027:1E3:18AC:8942:B097 ( talk) 07:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I'm seeing sources saying that and it has been added, so.....145. Selfstudier ( talk) 08:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The Times of Israel even says 145 UN members. Underdwarf58 ( talk) 14:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Please refer to the discussion here. Thoughts? Selfstudier ( talk) 21:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC) reply

What about going along those lines? - In 1988, Czechoslovakia officially recognised Palestine and this act was carried over to its legal successor Czechia. Lately, the government of Peter Fiala, in line with its pro-Israeli policy, began to question the continuing recognition, arguing that there is currently no Palestinian entity fulfilling the criteria of an independent state. However, Czechia did not formally revoke the 1988 act, and the Czech government and the Palestinian Authority continue to maintain diplomatic relations. Needs copyediting and adding sources.— kashmīrī  ^TALK 13:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Added per BOLD. I suggest moving Czechia to countries that do recognise Palestine, per lots of sources and the actual legal situation it seems. — kashmīrī  ^TALK 23:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

So that technically makes it 146 countries recognizing it? Underdwarf58 ( talk) 14:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Unless someone is going to make some strong objection, it seems there is sufficient sourcing to say that, yes. Perhaps give it a little more time before adding it. Selfstudier ( talk) 14:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC) reply

To make it clearer to readers, could you please add the percentage of countries that recognize Palestine to the first sentence, making it be “As of July 2024, the State of Palestine is recognized as a sovereign state by 145 of the 193 (75.13%) member states of the United Nations.” 77.137.75.98 ( talk) 11:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

How about "three quarters" per This sourcerecognition of the Palestinian State? Selfstudier ( talk) 11:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

I’d go with the percentage as it will probably be changing slightly with time, and I guess everyone understands that over 75% means over three quarters. Still, the following sentence also is missing a word, I believe it should read “due to THE FACT THAT the United States…” 176.12.184.253 ( talk) 12:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Might be a way to automate the %... Selfstudier ( talk) 12:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Seems fine, or "more than three-quarters". Two decimal places, even talking about a percentage of countries, just seems silly. What's 0.13% of a country? Iskandar323 ( talk) 13:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

{{Numrec|Pal}} produces 145 but unfortunately {{percentage|{{Numrec|Pal}}|193|0}} doesn't seem to work for a %. Anyone know how to do that? Selfstudier ( talk) 15:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

So could you just add 75% for now? Someone will always remember to change it for each new recognition. But the following sentence is still grammatically wrong / not proper English: “due to the United States, a permanent member (…), has consistently used” - should be “due to the fact that the United States (…) has consistently used” in proper English. 2A00:A041:3B9A:AC00:439:4B8A:FA1C:5595 ( talk) 22:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done — kashmīrī  ^TALK 23:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC) reply