This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International reactions to the January 6 United States Capitol attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2021 storming of the United States Capitol was copied or moved into International reactions to the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
On 28 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from International reactions to the 2021 United States Capitol attack to International reactions to the January 6 United States Capitol attack. The result of the discussion was moved. |
It looks unusual for a global reactions page to include over half of Europe's heads of state and not have a single thing from Africa. 2A02:C7D:B747:2500:F827:82A7:F25C:6226 ( talk) 16:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
@Erzan: The argument has been made that Scotland should not be mentioned as it is not relevant to the article. However, Scotland is technically a dependant nation of the United Kingdom and this article also features people who are no longer in office as well as high-level diplomats and international organizations. Please discuss here before editing. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 19:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
While the reaction of Justin Trudeau has been included, other Canadian politicians have also reacted to the event both in official and personal capacities; Conservative Party leader Erin O'Toole called the event an "astonishing assault on freedom and democracy", New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh called it "frightening" and said "it was incited by Donald Trump", and François-Philippe Champagne, Canada's Minister of Foreign Affairs, said "The peaceful transition of power is fundamental to democracy - it must continue and it will." Are these worthy of being included? Builder018 ( talk) 21:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
References
Should [sic] be added to the adjective "insightful"? Perhaps the Malaysian politician meant "incendiary" because "insightful" has a rather positive connotation, but it's clear based on the context that Ibrahim is not praising Trump. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.143.101 ( talk) 21:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, "inciteful" is indeed more likely to be closer to what he meant. We are in agreement! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.143.101 ( talk) 19:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
A primary source for Mikhail Gorbachev's statement was found, the prior source was " https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/01/07/putin-silent-on-washington-unrest-as-russian-foreign-ministry-calls-us-electoral-system-archaic-a72549" however after some searching, closer source of " https://www.interfax.ru/world/744285" due to my newness to Wikipedia, I do not know if or how I should implement it. Emerycole237 ( talk) 00:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Potentially related to the discussion above, but I'd prefer this point not to be lost in the noise. Could someone clarify the difference between the "Sovereign states" section and the "Political parties and organizations" section? Is the former designed for heads of state/government only? FDW777 ( talk) 13:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Muinax: See Sovereign state#De facto and de jure states. Please reach consensus first before making any more edits. Normchou 💬 04:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Added supplementary notes for clarification. Normchou 💬 04:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
We don't have a section about international media reactions yet. If we want to add one, these sources might provide an overview / starting point: Irish Times, BBC, CNBC. — Chrisahn ( talk) 19:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2021 United States Capitol attack which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International reactions to the January 6 United States Capitol attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2021 storming of the United States Capitol was copied or moved into International reactions to the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
On 28 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from International reactions to the 2021 United States Capitol attack to International reactions to the January 6 United States Capitol attack. The result of the discussion was moved. |
It looks unusual for a global reactions page to include over half of Europe's heads of state and not have a single thing from Africa. 2A02:C7D:B747:2500:F827:82A7:F25C:6226 ( talk) 16:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
@Erzan: The argument has been made that Scotland should not be mentioned as it is not relevant to the article. However, Scotland is technically a dependant nation of the United Kingdom and this article also features people who are no longer in office as well as high-level diplomats and international organizations. Please discuss here before editing. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 19:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
While the reaction of Justin Trudeau has been included, other Canadian politicians have also reacted to the event both in official and personal capacities; Conservative Party leader Erin O'Toole called the event an "astonishing assault on freedom and democracy", New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh called it "frightening" and said "it was incited by Donald Trump", and François-Philippe Champagne, Canada's Minister of Foreign Affairs, said "The peaceful transition of power is fundamental to democracy - it must continue and it will." Are these worthy of being included? Builder018 ( talk) 21:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
References
Should [sic] be added to the adjective "insightful"? Perhaps the Malaysian politician meant "incendiary" because "insightful" has a rather positive connotation, but it's clear based on the context that Ibrahim is not praising Trump. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.143.101 ( talk) 21:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, "inciteful" is indeed more likely to be closer to what he meant. We are in agreement! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.143.101 ( talk) 19:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
A primary source for Mikhail Gorbachev's statement was found, the prior source was " https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/01/07/putin-silent-on-washington-unrest-as-russian-foreign-ministry-calls-us-electoral-system-archaic-a72549" however after some searching, closer source of " https://www.interfax.ru/world/744285" due to my newness to Wikipedia, I do not know if or how I should implement it. Emerycole237 ( talk) 00:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Potentially related to the discussion above, but I'd prefer this point not to be lost in the noise. Could someone clarify the difference between the "Sovereign states" section and the "Political parties and organizations" section? Is the former designed for heads of state/government only? FDW777 ( talk) 13:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Muinax: See Sovereign state#De facto and de jure states. Please reach consensus first before making any more edits. Normchou 💬 04:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Added supplementary notes for clarification. Normchou 💬 04:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
We don't have a section about international media reactions yet. If we want to add one, these sources might provide an overview / starting point: Irish Times, BBC, CNBC. — Chrisahn ( talk) 19:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2021 United States Capitol attack which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)