GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 18:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
I've now done a quick initial read of the article, but I've not at this stage checked any references or checked the copyright status of any of the figures / images. Apart from these two points the article appears to be at or about GA-level, but there are a few "obvious" minor problems such as undefined abbreviations, such as GCPM (I'll probably fix this one myself.
I'm now going to work my way through the article, section by section, but started at History and finishing with the Lede. This will likely take up to a week or so. Pyrotec ( talk) 14:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 22:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 20:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
I changed "Worldwide" to "Global". (For clarification) This is not a requirement of GAN, I considered to be a a minor improvement. Pyrotec ( talk) 16:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This appears to be compliant with WP:Lead, in so far as it provides both (as required) an introduction to the topic of the article and a summary of the main points in the body of the article. The current lead also appears to reflect the "balance of the body" of the article, however, for an article of this length the article would be improved if the four-paragraph lead was perhaps expanded to provide a little more detail (but still within the four-paragraph format). Nethertheless, I'm going to award GA-status to the article as it stands. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I'm happy to be able (at long last) to be able to award this article GA-status. Congratulations on a fine article.
Pyrotec (
talk)
20:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 18:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
I've now done a quick initial read of the article, but I've not at this stage checked any references or checked the copyright status of any of the figures / images. Apart from these two points the article appears to be at or about GA-level, but there are a few "obvious" minor problems such as undefined abbreviations, such as GCPM (I'll probably fix this one myself.
I'm now going to work my way through the article, section by section, but started at History and finishing with the Lede. This will likely take up to a week or so. Pyrotec ( talk) 14:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 22:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 20:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
I changed "Worldwide" to "Global". (For clarification) This is not a requirement of GAN, I considered to be a a minor improvement. Pyrotec ( talk) 16:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This appears to be compliant with WP:Lead, in so far as it provides both (as required) an introduction to the topic of the article and a summary of the main points in the body of the article. The current lead also appears to reflect the "balance of the body" of the article, however, for an article of this length the article would be improved if the four-paragraph lead was perhaps expanded to provide a little more detail (but still within the four-paragraph format). Nethertheless, I'm going to award GA-status to the article as it stands. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I'm happy to be able (at long last) to be able to award this article GA-status. Congratulations on a fine article.
Pyrotec (
talk)
20:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)