![]() | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International Rice Research Institute article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
|
|
I have been editting the IRRI wikipedia entry to help provide some references and more information about the organization. I am the Public Relations Manager of IRRI so I have a clear conflict of interest that I want to declare. My edits are all tagged to me so readers can see what changes I have made and dispute or change anything that is unreferenced or looks like propaganda. I will endeavour to keep a neutral point of view in making furture edits, but will welcome input from other editors to keep things so. Sophie Clayton ( talk) 04:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
In 2010 Sophie Clayton declared a COI on this Talk page - she is the PR Manager for IRRI, and the COI is obvious. Until the last few weeks, this has not appeared to be an issue, but it has become apparant that Editors have found this conflict to be too great. On the Golden Rice page, following some discussion, Sophie's remaining edits have been removed. (Note that Sophie has been active in the process of cleaning up some 'questionable' editing on various pages, and this involvement is to be applauded imho.) The Golden Rice changes prompted me to think about this page, and how it should be dealt with. If Sophie is too conflicted to edit the Golden Rice page, then this one, and some others, need serious scrutiny. Any thoughts? It has also been suggested that this discussion, framed slightly wider, could be usefully had on the WT:AG talk page. Roxy the dog ( talk) 09:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
I've archived all the old stuff from 2006-2012. There's a little bit of overlap with the current discussions, but all of it is pretty old. I kept Sophie's 2010 COI declaration on this page, and included a copy in the Archive. Lou Sander ( talk) 01:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
I modified the redirection from IRRI to send to this page rather than some minor Game of Thrones character. I hope that everyone agrees that this is the more relevant meaning of IRRI. Marcrr ( talk) 14:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
International Rice Research Institute. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
There is at least a moderate amount of serious controversy over the genetically modified Golden Rice that was developed by IRRI, and there are many reliable references pertaining to that controversy. The article currently only has one sentence about it, referring to some vandalism done by anti-GMO activists. IMHO there should be much more about this controversy in the article. Maybe it deserves a short section of its own. Unless somebody has a strong objection, I propose to write it up and put it into the article. Lou Sander ( talk) 23:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International Rice Research Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:02, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International Rice Research Institute article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
|
|
I have been editting the IRRI wikipedia entry to help provide some references and more information about the organization. I am the Public Relations Manager of IRRI so I have a clear conflict of interest that I want to declare. My edits are all tagged to me so readers can see what changes I have made and dispute or change anything that is unreferenced or looks like propaganda. I will endeavour to keep a neutral point of view in making furture edits, but will welcome input from other editors to keep things so. Sophie Clayton ( talk) 04:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
In 2010 Sophie Clayton declared a COI on this Talk page - she is the PR Manager for IRRI, and the COI is obvious. Until the last few weeks, this has not appeared to be an issue, but it has become apparant that Editors have found this conflict to be too great. On the Golden Rice page, following some discussion, Sophie's remaining edits have been removed. (Note that Sophie has been active in the process of cleaning up some 'questionable' editing on various pages, and this involvement is to be applauded imho.) The Golden Rice changes prompted me to think about this page, and how it should be dealt with. If Sophie is too conflicted to edit the Golden Rice page, then this one, and some others, need serious scrutiny. Any thoughts? It has also been suggested that this discussion, framed slightly wider, could be usefully had on the WT:AG talk page. Roxy the dog ( talk) 09:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
I've archived all the old stuff from 2006-2012. There's a little bit of overlap with the current discussions, but all of it is pretty old. I kept Sophie's 2010 COI declaration on this page, and included a copy in the Archive. Lou Sander ( talk) 01:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
I modified the redirection from IRRI to send to this page rather than some minor Game of Thrones character. I hope that everyone agrees that this is the more relevant meaning of IRRI. Marcrr ( talk) 14:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
International Rice Research Institute. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
There is at least a moderate amount of serious controversy over the genetically modified Golden Rice that was developed by IRRI, and there are many reliable references pertaining to that controversy. The article currently only has one sentence about it, referring to some vandalism done by anti-GMO activists. IMHO there should be much more about this controversy in the article. Maybe it deserves a short section of its own. Unless somebody has a strong objection, I propose to write it up and put it into the article. Lou Sander ( talk) 23:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International Rice Research Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:02, 15 November 2017 (UTC)