This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International Legion (Ukraine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 3 days
![]() |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about International Legion (Ukraine). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about International Legion (Ukraine) at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 11 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from International Legion of Territorial Defence of Ukraine to International Legion (Ukraine). The result of the discussion was moved. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The legality part seems very flawed and uninformed - should this not be updated? If a news article that is sourced says that it's gray zone, it's usually legal. Some cases are also marked as "disencouraged" but not illegal, so it's not unclear. To mark it "unclear" shows that the article's editors have no knowledge about law or the matter and that this part is very lacking. I'm not a wikipedia user usually since some editors spew their stuff here and get proven wrong later even after whining to their favourite mods and getting their edits protected, but consider looking into it more for this article as I won't edit. 2001:14BA:A301:ACE8:0:0:0:1 ( talk) 22:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
mai army join karna chahta hu. Chandan Kumar766 ( talk) 14:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
I've given this a cleanup flag and made this topic to avoid an edit war. I believe that the paragraph in question should be deleted entirely, because it was a single anonymous source that does not seem to reflect the overall sentiment - since, after all, the selection criteria broadened. A later source corroborating this, from a more reliable (non anonymous) source is necessary.
If someone agrees that the paragraph should be deleted outright, please do so. I am only doing this to avoid edit warring. Just-a-can-of-beans ( talk) 19:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The subsection titled 'Notable criminals who joined the legion' should be deleted I believe. None of the people listed are/were in fact notable criminals. Two of the supposed "criminals" that were removed last week were either found not guilty of all criminal charges, or the charges were stayed before trial began. One of the still remaining people mentioned in this section is currently awaiting trial and is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Another was a juvenile offender whose crimes will never be disclosed, the others are a drug dealer, and a common gangster thug.
I propose deleting this subsection as the subject of criminality with the legion is covered elsewhere in the article and this adds nothing pertinent to the article.
-- 2607:FEA8:E983:F200:41C8:3122:7963:59A5 ( talk) 18:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
International Legion (Ukraine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 3 days
![]() |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about International Legion (Ukraine). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about International Legion (Ukraine) at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 11 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from International Legion of Territorial Defence of Ukraine to International Legion (Ukraine). The result of the discussion was moved. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The legality part seems very flawed and uninformed - should this not be updated? If a news article that is sourced says that it's gray zone, it's usually legal. Some cases are also marked as "disencouraged" but not illegal, so it's not unclear. To mark it "unclear" shows that the article's editors have no knowledge about law or the matter and that this part is very lacking. I'm not a wikipedia user usually since some editors spew their stuff here and get proven wrong later even after whining to their favourite mods and getting their edits protected, but consider looking into it more for this article as I won't edit. 2001:14BA:A301:ACE8:0:0:0:1 ( talk) 22:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
mai army join karna chahta hu. Chandan Kumar766 ( talk) 14:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
I've given this a cleanup flag and made this topic to avoid an edit war. I believe that the paragraph in question should be deleted entirely, because it was a single anonymous source that does not seem to reflect the overall sentiment - since, after all, the selection criteria broadened. A later source corroborating this, from a more reliable (non anonymous) source is necessary.
If someone agrees that the paragraph should be deleted outright, please do so. I am only doing this to avoid edit warring. Just-a-can-of-beans ( talk) 19:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The subsection titled 'Notable criminals who joined the legion' should be deleted I believe. None of the people listed are/were in fact notable criminals. Two of the supposed "criminals" that were removed last week were either found not guilty of all criminal charges, or the charges were stayed before trial began. One of the still remaining people mentioned in this section is currently awaiting trial and is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Another was a juvenile offender whose crimes will never be disclosed, the others are a drug dealer, and a common gangster thug.
I propose deleting this subsection as the subject of criminality with the legion is covered elsewhere in the article and this adds nothing pertinent to the article.
-- 2607:FEA8:E983:F200:41C8:3122:7963:59A5 ( talk) 18:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)