From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

This page was proposed for deletion for a number of reasons. However these are not easily resolved. The page was created by the editor of the journal. I could have asked someone else to do this but it would not make any material difference to the objectivity of the page. The journal is a peer reviewed publication by a respected publisher so this should not be grounds for removal. There are no references, but this would not be appropriate for a journal page that is essentially informational. I have added further associated publications and indices to reinforce the validity of the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dparsonsnz ( talkcontribs)

I have looked at a number of other journal pages in Wikipedia and would appreciate reference to one that is considered a suitable template for such pages. The IJMBL page is similar to (or better than) many others. I assume that Wikipedia does not consider peer reviewed academic journals to be inappropriate content per se 130.123.104.22 ( talk) 23:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply

If you let me know which pages you were looking at, I can deal with them too. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

This page was proposed for deletion for a number of reasons. However these are not easily resolved. The page was created by the editor of the journal. I could have asked someone else to do this but it would not make any material difference to the objectivity of the page. The journal is a peer reviewed publication by a respected publisher so this should not be grounds for removal. There are no references, but this would not be appropriate for a journal page that is essentially informational. I have added further associated publications and indices to reinforce the validity of the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dparsonsnz ( talkcontribs)

I have looked at a number of other journal pages in Wikipedia and would appreciate reference to one that is considered a suitable template for such pages. The IJMBL page is similar to (or better than) many others. I assume that Wikipedia does not consider peer reviewed academic journals to be inappropriate content per se 130.123.104.22 ( talk) 23:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply

If you let me know which pages you were looking at, I can deal with them too. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook