This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Obviously the nominator gave us little to work with. No one would find any fault with one of the participants here in the discussion if they decided to up and move this to a title they prefer, but there's absolutely no consensus here, obviously. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 02:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Requirements of IFRS →
Requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards –
WP:ARTICLETITLE
174.3.125.23 (
talk) 06:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.A Bold move would have been appropriate if there's a good case for this. If it's not obvious, then nom should have said something about why. This RM should be closed as vacuous, either way. Dicklyon ( talk) 02:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I can argue this one both ways. I don't think WP:PRECISE supports the move as claimed. But I do note that IFRS currently redirects to International Financial Reporting Standards. Line call, but I'd leave as is.
On the other hand, I don't think raising it here hurts. When in doubt I tend to favour going straight to a full RM. Agree that a bold move wouldn't have hurt either, but I think this RM is fine. Andrewa ( talk) 09:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
The bold thing would be to close this article altogether and move the content back to the main article International Financial Reporting Standards, where it originally was. That article is terrible, it does not actually describe IFRS. Swinnow16 ( talk) 00:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
No, I mean that I think International Financial Reporting Standards is a terrible article. Swinnow16 ( talk) 22:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
I've changed the heading from "21 February" to "12 February" to correct the date of the proposed deletion 174.3.125.23 ( talk) 10:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I mildly oppose the deletion unless it's intended to move the content back to International Financial Reporting Standards.
Swinnow16 ( talk) 22:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
I've edited the first paragraph, presentation of financial statements, to add footnotes including primary and secondary sources. I could potentially do the same for the rest of the article, but it's a waste of time of you're going to delete it anyway.
Do you actually understand IFRS or are you in any way interested in it? If so, why not have a go at editing this article or better still International Financial Reporting Standards? Or perhaps you think IFRS is already adequately explained in Wikipedia... Swinnow16 ( talk) 21:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa ( talk) 01:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Requirements of IFRS → International Financial Reporting Standards requirements – Per WP:ARTICLETITLE and WP:PRECISE, since the article is not necessarily a list, and User:BrownHairedGirl above: clarity and to expand an obscure abbreviation per WP:TITLEFORMAT: "Abbreviations and acronyms are often ambiguous and thus should be avoided unless the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject (e.g. NATO, laser, SCSI)." 174.3.125.23 ( talk) 22:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Obviously the nominator gave us little to work with. No one would find any fault with one of the participants here in the discussion if they decided to up and move this to a title they prefer, but there's absolutely no consensus here, obviously. ( non-admin closure) Red Slash 02:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Requirements of IFRS →
Requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards –
WP:ARTICLETITLE
174.3.125.23 (
talk) 06:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.A Bold move would have been appropriate if there's a good case for this. If it's not obvious, then nom should have said something about why. This RM should be closed as vacuous, either way. Dicklyon ( talk) 02:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
I can argue this one both ways. I don't think WP:PRECISE supports the move as claimed. But I do note that IFRS currently redirects to International Financial Reporting Standards. Line call, but I'd leave as is.
On the other hand, I don't think raising it here hurts. When in doubt I tend to favour going straight to a full RM. Agree that a bold move wouldn't have hurt either, but I think this RM is fine. Andrewa ( talk) 09:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
The bold thing would be to close this article altogether and move the content back to the main article International Financial Reporting Standards, where it originally was. That article is terrible, it does not actually describe IFRS. Swinnow16 ( talk) 00:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
No, I mean that I think International Financial Reporting Standards is a terrible article. Swinnow16 ( talk) 22:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
I've changed the heading from "21 February" to "12 February" to correct the date of the proposed deletion 174.3.125.23 ( talk) 10:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I mildly oppose the deletion unless it's intended to move the content back to International Financial Reporting Standards.
Swinnow16 ( talk) 22:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
I've edited the first paragraph, presentation of financial statements, to add footnotes including primary and secondary sources. I could potentially do the same for the rest of the article, but it's a waste of time of you're going to delete it anyway.
Do you actually understand IFRS or are you in any way interested in it? If so, why not have a go at editing this article or better still International Financial Reporting Standards? Or perhaps you think IFRS is already adequately explained in Wikipedia... Swinnow16 ( talk) 21:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa ( talk) 01:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Requirements of IFRS → International Financial Reporting Standards requirements – Per WP:ARTICLETITLE and WP:PRECISE, since the article is not necessarily a list, and User:BrownHairedGirl above: clarity and to expand an obscure abbreviation per WP:TITLEFORMAT: "Abbreviations and acronyms are often ambiguous and thus should be avoided unless the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject (e.g. NATO, laser, SCSI)." 174.3.125.23 ( talk) 22:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)