![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Image:IEA logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I added the dubious tag as it seems somewhat untrue from what I understand. Global strategic petroleum reserves isn't clear in some cases but it seems to me to imply most of the stores are petroleum i.e. crude oil not petroleum products (i.e. petrol, diesel etc). In Japan the government reserves are petroleum not petroleum products (there are some privately held petroleum products as a reserve but most of the reserve is petroleum). And the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve which is after all about 1/5 of the reserves is mostly crude oil according to that article. Nil Einne ( talk) 15:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
The UK is also no longer a net exporter of petroleum/oil so I presume they need to have a (small) reserve anyway and are no longer exempt even aside from the EU. [1] Nil Einne ( talk) 15:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
194.66.226.95 ( talk) 11:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Key oil figures were distorted by US pressure, says whistleblower
Sean Heron ( talk) 21:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes it is, but apparently someone is deleting the reference to the article... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
83.222.49.180 (
talk) 13:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
This article has no basis in fact and doesn't seem worth mentionning. There are always disgruntled employees in any organization. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
EnergyStatMan (
talk •
contribs) 22:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
the agency now has a new logo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.222.54.180 ( talk) 01:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I find the focus of this article very odd. It's loaded with critiques of the agency, but it doesn't tell us much about the agency or what it does. I came to this page to learn what the IEA is, and I leave no wiser, other than that some folks think they're pro-oil. I really don't care about the bias (although it shouldn't really be most of the article). What I do care about is that commentary has supplanted factual content. Can anyone with knowledge of the agency fill in more of the basics of what the IEA is and does? What is its mission? What projects is it involved in? What are its successes, if any? How big is it and how large is its budget? How is it governed? Someone must think it performs a useful function; what is that function? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.253.4.21 ( talk) 18 February 2011
IEA publishes a ton of stuff, and it is very difficult to navigate in. So I would like to update Wikipedia with some kind of overview. I have written the stuff below, but there are still a lot to be uncovered, stuff that I could not find out.
IEA produces approximately 70 free and 30 priced publications per year. The most significant is the priced World Energy Outlook, published annually. There are three major categories of reports:
This edit brings the article up-to-date, but removes historical information. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 17:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International Energy Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on International Energy Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Image:IEA logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I added the dubious tag as it seems somewhat untrue from what I understand. Global strategic petroleum reserves isn't clear in some cases but it seems to me to imply most of the stores are petroleum i.e. crude oil not petroleum products (i.e. petrol, diesel etc). In Japan the government reserves are petroleum not petroleum products (there are some privately held petroleum products as a reserve but most of the reserve is petroleum). And the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve which is after all about 1/5 of the reserves is mostly crude oil according to that article. Nil Einne ( talk) 15:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
The UK is also no longer a net exporter of petroleum/oil so I presume they need to have a (small) reserve anyway and are no longer exempt even aside from the EU. [1] Nil Einne ( talk) 15:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
194.66.226.95 ( talk) 11:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Key oil figures were distorted by US pressure, says whistleblower
Sean Heron ( talk) 21:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes it is, but apparently someone is deleting the reference to the article... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
83.222.49.180 (
talk) 13:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
This article has no basis in fact and doesn't seem worth mentionning. There are always disgruntled employees in any organization. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
EnergyStatMan (
talk •
contribs) 22:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
the agency now has a new logo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.222.54.180 ( talk) 01:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I find the focus of this article very odd. It's loaded with critiques of the agency, but it doesn't tell us much about the agency or what it does. I came to this page to learn what the IEA is, and I leave no wiser, other than that some folks think they're pro-oil. I really don't care about the bias (although it shouldn't really be most of the article). What I do care about is that commentary has supplanted factual content. Can anyone with knowledge of the agency fill in more of the basics of what the IEA is and does? What is its mission? What projects is it involved in? What are its successes, if any? How big is it and how large is its budget? How is it governed? Someone must think it performs a useful function; what is that function? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.253.4.21 ( talk) 18 February 2011
IEA publishes a ton of stuff, and it is very difficult to navigate in. So I would like to update Wikipedia with some kind of overview. I have written the stuff below, but there are still a lot to be uncovered, stuff that I could not find out.
IEA produces approximately 70 free and 30 priced publications per year. The most significant is the priced World Energy Outlook, published annually. There are three major categories of reports:
This edit brings the article up-to-date, but removes historical information. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 17:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on International Energy Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on International Energy Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)