This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Intercompany crossover redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
"Crossovers Under the Same Publisher"? You mean "guest appearances"? Characters from the same publisher crossover constantly? How is this a section? Without logical justification for it, I propose this section be deleted. -- Tenebrae 14:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Some kind of policing is needed as some of the additions are crossovers but within the same company
I did remove the various ones flagged as being between Image imprints but put them back in as Wildstorm, Image, Top Cow, etc. all had different lives (as is shown by a few of them going it alone and/or moving to other companies). For this reason Wildstorm and DC for example seems fine as an intercompany crossover as they can be considered separate companies for our purposes. There are probably more there but they ere the most obvious. For example, I'll leave RoboCop vs. The Terminator for now as Robocop has been published by Avatar (although this isn't clear in the entry if that was the case at the time). ( Emperor 15:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC))
I've put back Aliens vs Predator vs Terminator. Aliens and Predator are owned by 20th Century Fox and Terminator is owned by some other company (I don't remember it's name but it definitely isn't Fox). Therefore it is an intercompany crossover. The fact that Dark Horse had comic book rights to all 3 series at the time is irrelevant. 110.174.166.224 ( talk) 09:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
On that point.... Superman is owned by DC and Spiderman by Marvel, so if DC and Marvel collaborate on a comic where they meet, that's an intercompany crossover. But Batman is owned by DC, and Doc Savage is owned by somebody-or-other (I forget who) but was licensed by DC to appear in comics, including one with Batman. Is that an intercompany-crossover? Personally, I would say not, since DC has the use of both characters. 86.179.191.20 ( talk) 14:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The introductory text for the article is pretty specific: "Although a meeting between a licensed character and a wholly owned character (e.g., between Red Sonja and Spider-Man, or Ash Williams and the Marvel Zombies) is technically an intercompany crossover, comics companies rarely bill them as such." We should abide by that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.60.33 ( talk) 00:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Image:SupermanvsSpider-Man1976.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Inferior5 n10.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Witchblade&Tomb Raider.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Batman Hellboy Starman.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Lobo JudgeDredd.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Wizardofozcomic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spawn&WildC.A.T.s.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Are Miscellaneous Crossovers unpublished? Duggy 1138 ( talk) 12:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb ( talk) 16:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
In Spider-man (2002), a DC-comics character (Superman) is referenced in the Marvel-comics film via the line, "You do too much; you're not Superman." Would that be enough to count as an Intercompany crossover in film? MarkoOhNo ( talk) 10:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Should the Marvel character Buried Alien (Fastforward) be included? It is somewhat similar to Marvel's Mantis & DC's Willow. While Barry Allen was dead/in the speed force) over in DC, Buried Alien made a couple appearances over in Marvel. Just like with Mantis at DC, Everything suggested this was Barry. Even called him fastest man alive. Marvel wikia explains it very well. However this also raises another question... Are there more characters like Mantis/Willow & Barry Allen/Buried Alien that can be listed? Yeah of course be insane to try and include other companies parodies. The comical ones or such as the very Justice League like team that Marvel's Illuminati (in their New Avengers title). This team, The Great Society, clearly never was intented to be the Justice League but a parody of them. Buried Alien & Willow are almost like backdoor crossovers. They happen in canon, written so these characters could have travelled to that reality, issues are filled with direct hints who they really are, and importantly they both continue what happened with the character (With DC's wonky timelines... Buried Allen was in line with Pre-Final Crisis explaination where Barry was trapped in the Speed Force). But of course never outright say it. I can try and find some more of these if should be included.-- Jp0d009 ( talk) 23:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Intercompany crossover. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
As it stands, this article is becoming an indiscriminate collection of crossovers. May I suggest we split off a List of notable intercompany crossovers, and reduce the number listed. Killer Moff ( talk) 17:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Intercompany crossover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
The video games section includes a strictly TV crossover from " Mathlete's Feat", and possibly other film/TV crossovers. These need a separate section. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 01:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The film rights to Spider-Man are owned by Sony's Columbia Pictures. Do the MCU films with Spider-Man count as intercompany crossovers? -- LegerPrime ( talk) 03:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
How are the "Miscellaneous crossovers" any different than the other comic book crossovers? If there are no objections, I will be merging them with the rest of the list. -- 114.77.142.146 ( talk) 07:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
In this way, heroes originally published by different companies can become part of the same fictional universe, and interactions between such characters are no longer considered intercompany crossovers.
This sentence is being used to justify the removal of the Conan/Marvel crossovers from the list. However, this sentence refers to DC's purchase of the characters Captain Marvel, Plastic Man and Captain Atom. Since these characters are now owned by DC, interactions between such characters are indeed not intercompany crossovers. Marvel did NOT purchase Conan. Marvel licensed Conan, so any interactions between Conan and Marvel characters are still intercompany crossovers. They should be re-instated.
An example of a crossover that should be removed is Vampirella vs. Purgatori (2021) because both characters are now owned by Dynamite Entertainment. -- 58.105.78.220 ( talk) 14:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The page as it currently stands is comically useless. It is literally just two sentences at this point. It keeps getting edited down to bare bones knowledge that anyone could guess by the title of the page. As it was before, it was a little messy, but still had pertinent information the average person might now know, such as lists of comic book intercompany crossovers. Now, it's just a tiny page with nothing of substance at all. Daffy0211 ( talk) 02:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Intercompany crossover redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
"Crossovers Under the Same Publisher"? You mean "guest appearances"? Characters from the same publisher crossover constantly? How is this a section? Without logical justification for it, I propose this section be deleted. -- Tenebrae 14:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Some kind of policing is needed as some of the additions are crossovers but within the same company
I did remove the various ones flagged as being between Image imprints but put them back in as Wildstorm, Image, Top Cow, etc. all had different lives (as is shown by a few of them going it alone and/or moving to other companies). For this reason Wildstorm and DC for example seems fine as an intercompany crossover as they can be considered separate companies for our purposes. There are probably more there but they ere the most obvious. For example, I'll leave RoboCop vs. The Terminator for now as Robocop has been published by Avatar (although this isn't clear in the entry if that was the case at the time). ( Emperor 15:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC))
I've put back Aliens vs Predator vs Terminator. Aliens and Predator are owned by 20th Century Fox and Terminator is owned by some other company (I don't remember it's name but it definitely isn't Fox). Therefore it is an intercompany crossover. The fact that Dark Horse had comic book rights to all 3 series at the time is irrelevant. 110.174.166.224 ( talk) 09:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
On that point.... Superman is owned by DC and Spiderman by Marvel, so if DC and Marvel collaborate on a comic where they meet, that's an intercompany crossover. But Batman is owned by DC, and Doc Savage is owned by somebody-or-other (I forget who) but was licensed by DC to appear in comics, including one with Batman. Is that an intercompany-crossover? Personally, I would say not, since DC has the use of both characters. 86.179.191.20 ( talk) 14:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The introductory text for the article is pretty specific: "Although a meeting between a licensed character and a wholly owned character (e.g., between Red Sonja and Spider-Man, or Ash Williams and the Marvel Zombies) is technically an intercompany crossover, comics companies rarely bill them as such." We should abide by that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.60.33 ( talk) 00:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Image:SupermanvsSpider-Man1976.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Inferior5 n10.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Witchblade&Tomb Raider.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Batman Hellboy Starman.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Lobo JudgeDredd.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Wizardofozcomic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spawn&WildC.A.T.s.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Are Miscellaneous Crossovers unpublished? Duggy 1138 ( talk) 12:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb ( talk) 16:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
In Spider-man (2002), a DC-comics character (Superman) is referenced in the Marvel-comics film via the line, "You do too much; you're not Superman." Would that be enough to count as an Intercompany crossover in film? MarkoOhNo ( talk) 10:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Should the Marvel character Buried Alien (Fastforward) be included? It is somewhat similar to Marvel's Mantis & DC's Willow. While Barry Allen was dead/in the speed force) over in DC, Buried Alien made a couple appearances over in Marvel. Just like with Mantis at DC, Everything suggested this was Barry. Even called him fastest man alive. Marvel wikia explains it very well. However this also raises another question... Are there more characters like Mantis/Willow & Barry Allen/Buried Alien that can be listed? Yeah of course be insane to try and include other companies parodies. The comical ones or such as the very Justice League like team that Marvel's Illuminati (in their New Avengers title). This team, The Great Society, clearly never was intented to be the Justice League but a parody of them. Buried Alien & Willow are almost like backdoor crossovers. They happen in canon, written so these characters could have travelled to that reality, issues are filled with direct hints who they really are, and importantly they both continue what happened with the character (With DC's wonky timelines... Buried Allen was in line with Pre-Final Crisis explaination where Barry was trapped in the Speed Force). But of course never outright say it. I can try and find some more of these if should be included.-- Jp0d009 ( talk) 23:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Intercompany crossover. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
As it stands, this article is becoming an indiscriminate collection of crossovers. May I suggest we split off a List of notable intercompany crossovers, and reduce the number listed. Killer Moff ( talk) 17:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Intercompany crossover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
The video games section includes a strictly TV crossover from " Mathlete's Feat", and possibly other film/TV crossovers. These need a separate section. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 01:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The film rights to Spider-Man are owned by Sony's Columbia Pictures. Do the MCU films with Spider-Man count as intercompany crossovers? -- LegerPrime ( talk) 03:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
How are the "Miscellaneous crossovers" any different than the other comic book crossovers? If there are no objections, I will be merging them with the rest of the list. -- 114.77.142.146 ( talk) 07:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
In this way, heroes originally published by different companies can become part of the same fictional universe, and interactions between such characters are no longer considered intercompany crossovers.
This sentence is being used to justify the removal of the Conan/Marvel crossovers from the list. However, this sentence refers to DC's purchase of the characters Captain Marvel, Plastic Man and Captain Atom. Since these characters are now owned by DC, interactions between such characters are indeed not intercompany crossovers. Marvel did NOT purchase Conan. Marvel licensed Conan, so any interactions between Conan and Marvel characters are still intercompany crossovers. They should be re-instated.
An example of a crossover that should be removed is Vampirella vs. Purgatori (2021) because both characters are now owned by Dynamite Entertainment. -- 58.105.78.220 ( talk) 14:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The page as it currently stands is comically useless. It is literally just two sentences at this point. It keeps getting edited down to bare bones knowledge that anyone could guess by the title of the page. As it was before, it was a little messy, but still had pertinent information the average person might now know, such as lists of comic book intercompany crossovers. Now, it's just a tiny page with nothing of substance at all. Daffy0211 ( talk) 02:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)