This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

American football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canadian football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. College football High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

"taint" (touchdown after interception)

Never heard of this before. 72.200.134.203 ( talk) 21:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC) reply

I agree. It was added by an anon on 21 October 2008 and smells like a hoax/joke. I'll remove it and it should not be reinserted without a reference. Thanks, DOUBLEBLUE ( talk) 22:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Eh, it's not a hoax, but I don't think it belongs in this article. Simmons writes entertaining articles, but he uses this term purely because of its association with the anatomical slang meaning. -- Ernieba1 ( talk) 14:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC) reply