![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I would argue that visualization is by definition interactive. It goes without saying that people use mice, keyboards, etc. to interact with visual data on computers in real time. I suppose it doesn't hurt to explicitly say so, but I don't think it's worth a separate article. I propose merging this with Visualization (computer graphics).
Brad Halls 20:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
If we are doing to keep this article on "interactive" visualization (implying that this is somehow fundamentally different than visualization itself), then I think that in order to be consistent, we need to also create the following new articles:
Brad Halls ( talk) 01:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, I think I have made my opinion pretty clear. Not much else to say, do what you will :-) Brad Halls ( talk) 17:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interactive visualization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I would argue that visualization is by definition interactive. It goes without saying that people use mice, keyboards, etc. to interact with visual data on computers in real time. I suppose it doesn't hurt to explicitly say so, but I don't think it's worth a separate article. I propose merging this with Visualization (computer graphics).
Brad Halls 20:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
If we are doing to keep this article on "interactive" visualization (implying that this is somehow fundamentally different than visualization itself), then I think that in order to be consistent, we need to also create the following new articles:
Brad Halls ( talk) 01:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, I think I have made my opinion pretty clear. Not much else to say, do what you will :-) Brad Halls ( talk) 17:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interactive visualization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)