Interactions (The Spectacular Spider-Man) is a
former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check
the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the lead, you might want to remove "popular", since it is a peacock term, per
here. Same section, "who's" ---> "whose". Same section and Reception section, it would be best to avoid "...mixed to positive reviews", so just say "The episode received mixed reviews, with IGN commenting that "While not as strong as the pilot, the episode had some notable moments." In the Plot summary, "Dr. Connors" (Dee Bradley Baker). Why isn't set up for the other characters? You need to have a consistency. Same section, "...Max Dillon (Crispin Freeman) works on upgrading the electrical filters until he falls into the tank and is sent to the hospital, quarantined because his is giving off strong electric fields", is "his" supposed to be "he"? If not, you might want to re-write the sentence.Same section, "Peter, meanwhile, gets assigned to study a popular girl named Liz Allan (Alanna Ubach)", Peter studies with or on? Also, add a period after (Alanna Ubach). Same section, "When he attempts to tutor her at a cafe", the beginning of the sentence seems kind of off. A re-write should suffice.Same section, "He leaves and Peter, thinking he is dangerous", "thinking" ---> "believing". Same section, "he attacks", who does Max attack? Spider-Man? Civilians? You need to make that clear. Same section, "...Peter confronts Liz to tell he's terrible at tutoring her" ---> "...Peter apologizes [you can replace with another word] to Liz, explaining he is terrible at tutoring", something like that. In the Production section, maybe adding "Voice actor" in front of Crispin Freeman, just a suggestion. In the Reception section, "...Peter was trying to talk to Aunt May on the phone at the same time as he's fighting Electro" ---> "...Peter was trying to talk to Aunt May on the phone at the same time as he is fighting Electro".
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
In the lead, the IGN comment should have the source after the quote has concluded, per
here.
Done!
Check.
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Are Mania.com and Gargoyles: A Station Eight Fan Web Site reliable sources?
Just to add (BTW, thanks Peregrine Fisher for explaining these while I was away) the Gargoyles website was actually confirmed by Weisman to actually be really him answering questions
here. The Flash{talk}23:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)reply
You're welcome for the review. After looking over the article, I would like to thank SuperFlash for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, cause I have gone off and passed the article to GA. Congrats. ;) --
ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)15:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment - I'm not the editor taking this to GA. In any case, I think the two websites mentioned above are reliable in this case. Mania.com is frequently referenced by other RSs.
[1] The other is an interview, and based on the large number of interviews that site conducts with cartoon people, I'd say it's reliable for the words of the interviewee. -
Peregrine Fisher (
talk) (
contribs)
03:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I am afraid the quality of sources in this article does not match the standards of featured articles promoted today. If Magazine, Mania, a fan website/forum, Ultimate Disney (which is now DVD Dizzy) do not inspire confidence, and the Slice of SciFi and Comic Book Resources references are actually press releases (but not noted as such).
Heartfox (
talk)
18:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Taking a quick look at this, I agree with Heartfox's comments above. I will nominate this to FAR in a few weeks unless anyone is interested in fixing this up.
Z1720 (
talk)
12:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Interactions (The Spectacular Spider-Man) is a
former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check
the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the lead, you might want to remove "popular", since it is a peacock term, per
here. Same section, "who's" ---> "whose". Same section and Reception section, it would be best to avoid "...mixed to positive reviews", so just say "The episode received mixed reviews, with IGN commenting that "While not as strong as the pilot, the episode had some notable moments." In the Plot summary, "Dr. Connors" (Dee Bradley Baker). Why isn't set up for the other characters? You need to have a consistency. Same section, "...Max Dillon (Crispin Freeman) works on upgrading the electrical filters until he falls into the tank and is sent to the hospital, quarantined because his is giving off strong electric fields", is "his" supposed to be "he"? If not, you might want to re-write the sentence.Same section, "Peter, meanwhile, gets assigned to study a popular girl named Liz Allan (Alanna Ubach)", Peter studies with or on? Also, add a period after (Alanna Ubach). Same section, "When he attempts to tutor her at a cafe", the beginning of the sentence seems kind of off. A re-write should suffice.Same section, "He leaves and Peter, thinking he is dangerous", "thinking" ---> "believing". Same section, "he attacks", who does Max attack? Spider-Man? Civilians? You need to make that clear. Same section, "...Peter confronts Liz to tell he's terrible at tutoring her" ---> "...Peter apologizes [you can replace with another word] to Liz, explaining he is terrible at tutoring", something like that. In the Production section, maybe adding "Voice actor" in front of Crispin Freeman, just a suggestion. In the Reception section, "...Peter was trying to talk to Aunt May on the phone at the same time as he's fighting Electro" ---> "...Peter was trying to talk to Aunt May on the phone at the same time as he is fighting Electro".
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
In the lead, the IGN comment should have the source after the quote has concluded, per
here.
Done!
Check.
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Are Mania.com and Gargoyles: A Station Eight Fan Web Site reliable sources?
Just to add (BTW, thanks Peregrine Fisher for explaining these while I was away) the Gargoyles website was actually confirmed by Weisman to actually be really him answering questions
here. The Flash{talk}23:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)reply
You're welcome for the review. After looking over the article, I would like to thank SuperFlash for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, cause I have gone off and passed the article to GA. Congrats. ;) --
ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)15:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment - I'm not the editor taking this to GA. In any case, I think the two websites mentioned above are reliable in this case. Mania.com is frequently referenced by other RSs.
[1] The other is an interview, and based on the large number of interviews that site conducts with cartoon people, I'd say it's reliable for the words of the interviewee. -
Peregrine Fisher (
talk) (
contribs)
03:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I am afraid the quality of sources in this article does not match the standards of featured articles promoted today. If Magazine, Mania, a fan website/forum, Ultimate Disney (which is now DVD Dizzy) do not inspire confidence, and the Slice of SciFi and Comic Book Resources references are actually press releases (but not noted as such).
Heartfox (
talk)
18:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Taking a quick look at this, I agree with Heartfox's comments above. I will nominate this to FAR in a few weeks unless anyone is interested in fixing this up.
Z1720 (
talk)
12:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)reply