![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intensional logic is not a family of non-truth-functional logics. It is logic that treats both sense and reference of expressions. The whole article, while nicely enough written, goes off at the wrong tangent. Some can be salvaged, but the surgery will be savage. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
This:
needs to be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.217.237 ( talk) 12:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Intensional logic is not a family of non-truth-functional logics. It is logic that treats both sense and reference of expressions. The whole article, while nicely enough written, goes off at the wrong tangent. Some can be salvaged, but the surgery will be savage. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
This:
needs to be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.217.237 ( talk) 12:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)