This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 July 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature Social and political philosophy Contemporary philosophy

Guys, what the hell am I reading?

Intellectuals and Society examines the actual track record of these idea workers and the conditions, methods and incentives that drive their visions- visions that have often spelt disaster for societies where intellectuals have been allowed undue influence.

This is literally from the intro and I'm not sure this is even noteworthy enough to warrant an article. CartoonDiablo ( talk) 01:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

CartoonDiablo your the same person starting trouble on the Thomas Sowell Wiki with the MMFA qoute saga.  What agenda are you trying to push?  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
98.203.36.3 (
talk) 
08:47, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
reply 

This article doens't even state the year the book was published... 217.254.46.24 ( talk) 14:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply