This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Inside Edition article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Didn't the program receive a Polk Award when O'Reilly was host or right after he left? It was that whole controversy with O'Reilly mistakenly claiming he won a Peabody when it was Inside Edition who won the Polk? Arnabdas 19:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Is the awards section really necessary? For the most part, the awards do not seem to be prominent enough to be worth mentioning, let alone have its own dedicated section in the page. It seems, to me at least, that someone who works for, or is a big fan of the show added this entire section in an attempt to make the page look good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.10.166.1 ( talk) 16:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
This line clearly has nothing to do with this article American television viewers clearly need all the help they can get as the US economy continues to deteriorate. Either reword it, or remove it Paskari ( talk) 15:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure that the Bill O'Reilly outburst has any place here. The outburst itself was never aired on the show, and there's a whole huge paragraph about it. There isn't even a full paragraph describing Inside Edition while Bill O'Reilly was host. And why is the section labeled a controversy? A TV host getting angry off-air? Wow. Yeah. Huge controversy. I'm sure that's never happened before. And then we have some spam about Lucian Piane also in the paragraph. 70.224.17.162 ( talk) 03:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tJjNVVwRCY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2YDq6FkVE&feature=related Macshill ( talk) 00:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Manual of Style on heading ( WP:HEAD) says that:
not:
This may be unfamiliar to many editors who believe that or have been taught that "title case is the right way to capitalize headings". It isn't the "right way", it is one style. Wikipedia has, for better or worse, chosen to follow a different style, i.e., capitalize the heading the same way you would capitalize any sentence:
In addition, I have changed the heading "On-Air Talent" to "On-air staff". "Talent" is industry jargon. It does not describe the position or the work. It is meaningless to readers unfamiliar with American broadcast industry jargon, and is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. "Staff" indicates that these people are being listed because they work for the station. Ground Zero | t 03:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
This article states that he was the host from 1989 - 1995, however, in the Bill O'Reilly article, it states that he started at Inside Edition in 1991. So, which is it? 4.168.0.31 ( talk) 08:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
The opening paragraph of the History Section is in dire need of being rewritten for clarity. Right now it is a difficult rant, with a quick, unclear explanation of how the TV program has arrived at the current rendition, but it doesn't seem to work for it's history... What network originated the broadcast? Was it CBS? As currently written, it doesn't clearly say where it first began on air... Stevenmitchell ( talk) 04:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
"Inside Edition" and Pix 11 News team joined forces 71.247.208.187 ( talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Inside Edition article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Didn't the program receive a Polk Award when O'Reilly was host or right after he left? It was that whole controversy with O'Reilly mistakenly claiming he won a Peabody when it was Inside Edition who won the Polk? Arnabdas 19:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Is the awards section really necessary? For the most part, the awards do not seem to be prominent enough to be worth mentioning, let alone have its own dedicated section in the page. It seems, to me at least, that someone who works for, or is a big fan of the show added this entire section in an attempt to make the page look good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.10.166.1 ( talk) 16:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
This line clearly has nothing to do with this article American television viewers clearly need all the help they can get as the US economy continues to deteriorate. Either reword it, or remove it Paskari ( talk) 15:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure that the Bill O'Reilly outburst has any place here. The outburst itself was never aired on the show, and there's a whole huge paragraph about it. There isn't even a full paragraph describing Inside Edition while Bill O'Reilly was host. And why is the section labeled a controversy? A TV host getting angry off-air? Wow. Yeah. Huge controversy. I'm sure that's never happened before. And then we have some spam about Lucian Piane also in the paragraph. 70.224.17.162 ( talk) 03:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tJjNVVwRCY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2YDq6FkVE&feature=related Macshill ( talk) 00:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Manual of Style on heading ( WP:HEAD) says that:
not:
This may be unfamiliar to many editors who believe that or have been taught that "title case is the right way to capitalize headings". It isn't the "right way", it is one style. Wikipedia has, for better or worse, chosen to follow a different style, i.e., capitalize the heading the same way you would capitalize any sentence:
In addition, I have changed the heading "On-Air Talent" to "On-air staff". "Talent" is industry jargon. It does not describe the position or the work. It is meaningless to readers unfamiliar with American broadcast industry jargon, and is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. "Staff" indicates that these people are being listed because they work for the station. Ground Zero | t 03:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
This article states that he was the host from 1989 - 1995, however, in the Bill O'Reilly article, it states that he started at Inside Edition in 1991. So, which is it? 4.168.0.31 ( talk) 08:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
The opening paragraph of the History Section is in dire need of being rewritten for clarity. Right now it is a difficult rant, with a quick, unclear explanation of how the TV program has arrived at the current rendition, but it doesn't seem to work for it's history... What network originated the broadcast? Was it CBS? As currently written, it doesn't clearly say where it first began on air... Stevenmitchell ( talk) 04:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
"Inside Edition" and Pix 11 News team joined forces 71.247.208.187 ( talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)