This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: MOVED — UY Scuti Talk 05:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Taipei Metro CITYFLO650 → Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 – CITYFLO 650 is a wrong name by mixing up the name of the control system and that of the rolling stock. Either Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 or Taipei Metro C370 is better and without ambiguity. SElephant ( talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)-- SElephant ( talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Why does it say 2.54 when its name is from being 2.56 m wide? I put a Citation Needed tag in case it is 2.54 m wide in reality rather than change it to 2.56 m. QuarioQuario54321 ( talk) 15:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: MOVED — UY Scuti Talk 05:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Taipei Metro CITYFLO650 → Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 – CITYFLO 650 is a wrong name by mixing up the name of the control system and that of the rolling stock. Either Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 or Taipei Metro C370 is better and without ambiguity. SElephant ( talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)-- SElephant ( talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Why does it say 2.54 when its name is from being 2.56 m wide? I put a Citation Needed tag in case it is 2.54 m wide in reality rather than change it to 2.56 m. QuarioQuario54321 ( talk) 15:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)