This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
I'll watch this episode again to make sure, and then change the article if I'm right, but for now just thought I'd check. The article says Culluh encourages the Kazon children to kill Chakotay, but Culluh is Nistrim, and I thought these were the Ogla. Wouldn't it be Razik, the First Maje of the Ogla?
Billy Shears (
talk)
14:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Move?
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I think most people would expect the plural to redirect to the singular in this case. In any case, I think fuller discussion is in order.
older ≠
wiser21:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)reply
I want it known that I did not start this discussion here, I did not move this discussion here, and I do not want it implied I did either thing. Despite appearances, I made no edits to this talk page and had no intention or interest in beginning a discussion here or on this topic. I vehemently object to
Anthony Appleyard (
talk·contribs) moving my request here and making it appear as though I desired a discussion on the matter. If that user objected to my technical move request, then he or she was more than welcome to reject it there, not move it here and make it appear as though I wanted to make a spectacle or public inquisition on my request.
I made no edits to this page and redact Anthony Appleyard's impersonation or implication that I did so. If users who were misled or duped into participating in this discussion wish to continue doing so, they are of course welcome to with the understanding that I am not, and never was a part or instigator of it. — fourthords|=Λ=|10:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I don't know if there's an SOP for it or not. Again, I employed it at "
Tuvix" and didn't receive any pushback on it.
I know if we're writing biographies we may list their honours, e.g. knighthoods, congressional medals of honour, etc, but this just means the individual is a member of a society, many of us could claim that, surely?
The Rambling Man (
talk)
16:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
If I remember correctly, the stardate wasn't discussed in the episode, but instead comes from that source. Being Star Trek, I like giving the stardate because it's so tied into the public mythos and image of the franchise.
Should it be? I know to use n-dashes with ranges of numbers, but every source I looked up only hyphenated it.
It really was, in the episode. He beams over the young man, and then is almost immediately found and captured by the larger mothership. Without being superfluously wordy, I don't know what to change.
Thanks for the quick response. I note a few of your answers relate to things not being picked up or not being mentioned in a previous GAN of yours. I'm afraid I tend to review things as a blank page (in my mind) so all comments come from there. If I can find SOPs for you, I'll let you know, otherwise in general most review comments come from my experiences at FAC and FLC. I'll respond to your comments in-line shortly.
The Rambling Man (
talk)
16:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Following up.
I copied and pasted your phrasing into the article.
I removed the parentage ranking from the lede.
I removed the association letters from the info box.
I tweaked the wording in the second paragraph of the plot.
The source actually says to "just goofing around the whole time."
I used the capitalization you suggested for the capitalized citation.
It turns out I reused a citation when I actually should have inserted a new one from the same source, so I made that adjustment, too. Do you have any other suggestions or concerns? — fourthords |
=Λ= |22:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)reply
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
I'll watch this episode again to make sure, and then change the article if I'm right, but for now just thought I'd check. The article says Culluh encourages the Kazon children to kill Chakotay, but Culluh is Nistrim, and I thought these were the Ogla. Wouldn't it be Razik, the First Maje of the Ogla?
Billy Shears (
talk)
14:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Move?
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I think most people would expect the plural to redirect to the singular in this case. In any case, I think fuller discussion is in order.
older ≠
wiser21:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)reply
I want it known that I did not start this discussion here, I did not move this discussion here, and I do not want it implied I did either thing. Despite appearances, I made no edits to this talk page and had no intention or interest in beginning a discussion here or on this topic. I vehemently object to
Anthony Appleyard (
talk·contribs) moving my request here and making it appear as though I desired a discussion on the matter. If that user objected to my technical move request, then he or she was more than welcome to reject it there, not move it here and make it appear as though I wanted to make a spectacle or public inquisition on my request.
I made no edits to this page and redact Anthony Appleyard's impersonation or implication that I did so. If users who were misled or duped into participating in this discussion wish to continue doing so, they are of course welcome to with the understanding that I am not, and never was a part or instigator of it. — fourthords|=Λ=|10:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I don't know if there's an SOP for it or not. Again, I employed it at "
Tuvix" and didn't receive any pushback on it.
I know if we're writing biographies we may list their honours, e.g. knighthoods, congressional medals of honour, etc, but this just means the individual is a member of a society, many of us could claim that, surely?
The Rambling Man (
talk)
16:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
If I remember correctly, the stardate wasn't discussed in the episode, but instead comes from that source. Being Star Trek, I like giving the stardate because it's so tied into the public mythos and image of the franchise.
Should it be? I know to use n-dashes with ranges of numbers, but every source I looked up only hyphenated it.
It really was, in the episode. He beams over the young man, and then is almost immediately found and captured by the larger mothership. Without being superfluously wordy, I don't know what to change.
Thanks for the quick response. I note a few of your answers relate to things not being picked up or not being mentioned in a previous GAN of yours. I'm afraid I tend to review things as a blank page (in my mind) so all comments come from there. If I can find SOPs for you, I'll let you know, otherwise in general most review comments come from my experiences at FAC and FLC. I'll respond to your comments in-line shortly.
The Rambling Man (
talk)
16:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Following up.
I copied and pasted your phrasing into the article.
I removed the parentage ranking from the lede.
I removed the association letters from the info box.
I tweaked the wording in the second paragraph of the plot.
The source actually says to "just goofing around the whole time."
I used the capitalization you suggested for the capitalized citation.
It turns out I reused a citation when I actually should have inserted a new one from the same source, so I made that adjustment, too. Do you have any other suggestions or concerns? — fourthords |
=Λ= |22:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)reply
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: