This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The IMF exponent seemingly varies, according to galaxy type, from about 1.5 in lower mass galaxies, to nearly 3.0 in massive ellipticals. Popular references, referring to the original journal article:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120501211411.htm http://beforeitsnews.com/space/2012/04/under-dark-halo-old-galaxies-have-many-more-stars-2076436.html
66.235.38.214 ( talk) 04:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Some plots of the mass functions described would help here. Fig ( talk) 12:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Is it o'k the article's so compact?
What about - maybe - contriving another section — something about the usage?
NB. Is it ok the 'main' section staying the first while focusing on a rather mathematicised approach if I make ms clear?
Josh, linguist (
talk) 09:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
The following "reference" is moved from a section title in the article to here:
This section is added in the hope that it will be useful. Please note that the IMF variation is not a standard practice in the current astrophysics research. The possible intrinsic variation would cost huge trouble for the community. More detailed information and latest research progress are not provided due to the sensitive nature of the issue and a conflict of interest.
It was added by an anonymous editor together with some slightly WP:FRINGE commentary that I'm going to look into in more detail. Lithopsian ( talk) 14:21, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The IMF exponent seemingly varies, according to galaxy type, from about 1.5 in lower mass galaxies, to nearly 3.0 in massive ellipticals. Popular references, referring to the original journal article:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120501211411.htm http://beforeitsnews.com/space/2012/04/under-dark-halo-old-galaxies-have-many-more-stars-2076436.html
66.235.38.214 ( talk) 04:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Some plots of the mass functions described would help here. Fig ( talk) 12:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Is it o'k the article's so compact?
What about - maybe - contriving another section — something about the usage?
NB. Is it ok the 'main' section staying the first while focusing on a rather mathematicised approach if I make ms clear?
Josh, linguist (
talk) 09:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
The following "reference" is moved from a section title in the article to here:
This section is added in the hope that it will be useful. Please note that the IMF variation is not a standard practice in the current astrophysics research. The possible intrinsic variation would cost huge trouble for the community. More detailed information and latest research progress are not provided due to the sensitive nature of the issue and a conflict of interest.
It was added by an anonymous editor together with some slightly WP:FRINGE commentary that I'm going to look into in more detail. Lithopsian ( talk) 14:21, 14 April 2019 (UTC)