This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
An infoshop (the word being a portmanteau of information and shop)
I changed "portmanteau" to "contraction"; this was reverted with the comment "see
portmanteau". So I saw
portmanteau. In nearly every example there (or in
List of portmanteaus), neither component word is wholly preserved. The word in question could as easily be written info shop (info being a well established word) and no one would call that a portmanteau. —
Tamfang (
talk) 20:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Hiya yes I suppose the question for me would be ... is portmanteau correct if only one word is contracted. Would you prefer to use
compound? I don't think
contraction is quite correct because of what it says at
portmanteau: contractions are formed from words that would otherwise appear together in sequence, such as do and not to make don'tMujinga (
talk) 19:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
An infoshop (the word being a portmanteau of information and shop)
I changed "portmanteau" to "contraction"; this was reverted with the comment "see
portmanteau". So I saw
portmanteau. In nearly every example there (or in
List of portmanteaus), neither component word is wholly preserved. The word in question could as easily be written info shop (info being a well established word) and no one would call that a portmanteau. —
Tamfang (
talk) 20:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Hiya yes I suppose the question for me would be ... is portmanteau correct if only one word is contracted. Would you prefer to use
compound? I don't think
contraction is quite correct because of what it says at
portmanteau: contractions are formed from words that would otherwise appear together in sequence, such as do and not to make don'tMujinga (
talk) 19:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)reply