This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in India may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
People don't like crude propaganda. Please take it back. You are discrediting your own ideology. The 'Bias' section reads like a brainwashing session at some Hindutva rally. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.199.22.124 ( talk • contribs) 04:27, 24 Jun 2006 (UTC)
Are you trying to hint something? Anonymous, realize that Indology is somewhat personal to Indians and Hindu Scholars like Talageri are inherently superior to Witzel because they can truly analyze the Vedas and deduce the messages. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bakasuprman ( talk • contribs) 03:17, 27 Jul 2006 (UTC)
Why is this article in the pseudoscience category? brain 23:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Removed. deeptrivia ( talk) 23:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
it's just trolling. removed again. dab (𒁳) 09:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Indologist is a very short article containing little information. I see no reason why it should be separate from this article. Stebbins 05:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I observe that links to pages on David Frawley, Koenraad Elst and Srinivasan Kalyanaraman have been removed while those on Romila Thapar and Michael Witzel continue to stay. Well, David Frawley is a scholar on Sanskrit and Indian astrology who is widely known for strongly contesting Witzel's take on the Aryan Invasion Theory.He has authored a book The Myth of the Aryan Invasion wherein he challenges existing views on the Aryan Invasion Theory. Sinivasan Kalyanaraman is an acclaimed Indologist and linguist who has prepared a lexicon of ancient Indian languages and has authored several scholarly book on the Indus script. Could the person who has reverted those edits explain the basis upon which he has removed these entries while retaining Romila Thapar and Michael Witzel? Thanks - Ravichandar84 09:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Is Anti hinduism Genuine Indology —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.94.166 ( talk) 16:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add GS Ghurye to the list of Indologists
Asorpan ( talk) 11:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Puffin Let's talk! 14:38, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Editing the list "Contemporary Indologists with university posts in Indian Studies" to her name. If there are any objections, please revert. Iconoclastllama ( talk) 07:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclastllama ( talk • contribs) 07:06, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
One of the premier Indologists in the world is having the article about him being discussed for deletion.
7&6=thirteen (
☎) 18:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Indology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Indology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Indology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Should we re-title this article "South Asian Studies"? Indology is not a name used commonly anymore to describe this field, as SAS is the more common alternative. It better describes the field as well, one which is not limited to India but to the entire region, as noted in the introductory paragraph of the article itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwalk47 ( talk • contribs) 05:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
There has been no discussion on the template. Please restart the discussion or delete the template.-- Astrophile 2020 ( talk) 01:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Photography 2409:4063:4199:F51D:60A8:935D:C203:2612 ( talk) 16:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in India may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
People don't like crude propaganda. Please take it back. You are discrediting your own ideology. The 'Bias' section reads like a brainwashing session at some Hindutva rally. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.199.22.124 ( talk • contribs) 04:27, 24 Jun 2006 (UTC)
Are you trying to hint something? Anonymous, realize that Indology is somewhat personal to Indians and Hindu Scholars like Talageri are inherently superior to Witzel because they can truly analyze the Vedas and deduce the messages. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bakasuprman ( talk • contribs) 03:17, 27 Jul 2006 (UTC)
Why is this article in the pseudoscience category? brain 23:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Removed. deeptrivia ( talk) 23:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
it's just trolling. removed again. dab (𒁳) 09:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Indologist is a very short article containing little information. I see no reason why it should be separate from this article. Stebbins 05:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I observe that links to pages on David Frawley, Koenraad Elst and Srinivasan Kalyanaraman have been removed while those on Romila Thapar and Michael Witzel continue to stay. Well, David Frawley is a scholar on Sanskrit and Indian astrology who is widely known for strongly contesting Witzel's take on the Aryan Invasion Theory.He has authored a book The Myth of the Aryan Invasion wherein he challenges existing views on the Aryan Invasion Theory. Sinivasan Kalyanaraman is an acclaimed Indologist and linguist who has prepared a lexicon of ancient Indian languages and has authored several scholarly book on the Indus script. Could the person who has reverted those edits explain the basis upon which he has removed these entries while retaining Romila Thapar and Michael Witzel? Thanks - Ravichandar84 09:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Is Anti hinduism Genuine Indology —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.94.166 ( talk) 16:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add GS Ghurye to the list of Indologists
Asorpan ( talk) 11:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Puffin Let's talk! 14:38, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Editing the list "Contemporary Indologists with university posts in Indian Studies" to her name. If there are any objections, please revert. Iconoclastllama ( talk) 07:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclastllama ( talk • contribs) 07:06, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
One of the premier Indologists in the world is having the article about him being discussed for deletion.
7&6=thirteen (
☎) 18:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Indology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:08, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Indology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Indology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Should we re-title this article "South Asian Studies"? Indology is not a name used commonly anymore to describe this field, as SAS is the more common alternative. It better describes the field as well, one which is not limited to India but to the entire region, as noted in the introductory paragraph of the article itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwalk47 ( talk • contribs) 05:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
There has been no discussion on the template. Please restart the discussion or delete the template.-- Astrophile 2020 ( talk) 01:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Photography 2409:4063:4199:F51D:60A8:935D:C203:2612 ( talk) 16:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)