 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Why is this section even in here at all: "Indicator Species for Ancient Woodland in England"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.244.220 ( talk) 05:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Good question. The section should be moved to another article (I'm not sure where), or deleted. Moreau1 ( talk) 21:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that chemicals can be the biggest example of bioindicators.
I just added the Gray Jay to the Category:Indicator species of North America. They are probably being impacted by warming in: fall, winter, spring temperatures-( Global warming).
If you want to spend some time on wikipedia, then develop the articles first. Both articles, Indicator species, and Bioindicators are very under-developed, or have errors ( ! ). I just adjusted the Paragraph information to the preview for: Category:Indicator species of North America... So, go develop the articles, then you will find that "indicator species" of various Regions of the world is just a subset, referred to in: Bioindicators. ..from the "Sonoran Desert"-- Mmcannis 14:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
A repeat, Again.. the biggest bio-indicators are: C h e m i c a l s.... See for example: Chesapeake Bay, and its bio-indicator pollutants.
From the desert of AZ-..I vote: No Merge. Create 2- Articles. ....- Mmcannis 19:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
In practice, indicator species are used as a proxy for determining chemical contamination, because the effects of chemical contamination can still be evident when the chemicals are not actually present. This is particularly important in fresh water environments; point discharges of pollutants that wash downstream cannot be measured if polluters always obey the law whenever scientists or regulating authorities are performing measurements. Using diatometers or examining the species distribution of mayflies upstream and downstream can reveal very specific details of the chemicals that have been released into the water in the past. --Charlie
Should Indicator_plant be merged with this page? - 2601:E:1802:E600:BC8C:7D8:C8CF:3AEF ( talk) 19:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
YES. Both plant and animal species are used as indicators in field research and regulatory enforcement. There is no reason to have separate pages for a subset of indicators based on whether they conform to an obsolete animal/vegetable/mineral trichotomy. I would not go so far as to make one gigantic bioindicators page, but a separate page for Indicator_plant is overkill. --Charlie
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indicator species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150907012135/http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/about/coast/nsandt/musselwatch.aspx to http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/about/coast/nsandt/musselwatch.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indicator species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516044128/http://www.epa.gov/bioindicators/html/biointeg.html to http://www.epa.gov/bioindicators/html/biointeg.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Why is this section even in here at all: "Indicator Species for Ancient Woodland in England"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.244.220 ( talk) 05:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Good question. The section should be moved to another article (I'm not sure where), or deleted. Moreau1 ( talk) 21:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that chemicals can be the biggest example of bioindicators.
I just added the Gray Jay to the Category:Indicator species of North America. They are probably being impacted by warming in: fall, winter, spring temperatures-( Global warming).
If you want to spend some time on wikipedia, then develop the articles first. Both articles, Indicator species, and Bioindicators are very under-developed, or have errors ( ! ). I just adjusted the Paragraph information to the preview for: Category:Indicator species of North America... So, go develop the articles, then you will find that "indicator species" of various Regions of the world is just a subset, referred to in: Bioindicators. ..from the "Sonoran Desert"-- Mmcannis 14:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
A repeat, Again.. the biggest bio-indicators are: C h e m i c a l s.... See for example: Chesapeake Bay, and its bio-indicator pollutants.
From the desert of AZ-..I vote: No Merge. Create 2- Articles. ....- Mmcannis 19:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
In practice, indicator species are used as a proxy for determining chemical contamination, because the effects of chemical contamination can still be evident when the chemicals are not actually present. This is particularly important in fresh water environments; point discharges of pollutants that wash downstream cannot be measured if polluters always obey the law whenever scientists or regulating authorities are performing measurements. Using diatometers or examining the species distribution of mayflies upstream and downstream can reveal very specific details of the chemicals that have been released into the water in the past. --Charlie
Should Indicator_plant be merged with this page? - 2601:E:1802:E600:BC8C:7D8:C8CF:3AEF ( talk) 19:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
YES. Both plant and animal species are used as indicators in field research and regulatory enforcement. There is no reason to have separate pages for a subset of indicators based on whether they conform to an obsolete animal/vegetable/mineral trichotomy. I would not go so far as to make one gigantic bioindicators page, but a separate page for Indicator_plant is overkill. --Charlie
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indicator species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150907012135/http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/about/coast/nsandt/musselwatch.aspx to http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/about/coast/nsandt/musselwatch.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indicator species. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516044128/http://www.epa.gov/bioindicators/html/biointeg.html to http://www.epa.gov/bioindicators/html/biointeg.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)