![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In Réunion, the term Indo-Réunionnais is not mainstream. It would be better to have separate articles called Malbars and Zarabes. As for Franco-Réunionnais, it has been coined by Wikipédia. Thierry Caro ( talk) 19:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Again, the two groups would not fare well in separate articles. What has each individual group done to establish different articles? What significance would they have? In fact, Both articles would probably be deleted. This is why:
Together, they have more influence. The population of both groups is more significant when added together. Similarly, both groups are descended from India. And As a result, have a similar culture, save for Religion. Language too, is a uniting factor. Indians in Réunion as a whole can be researched more easily than as separate groups.
Take away these factors and what are you left with? Very little to go on -- Maurice45 ( talk) 21:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I have created Tamil Réunionnais quoting few lines from this article. Any how there is lot of variations between Tamils or called as Malabars in Reunion and North Indians. So I created this page. if any one having disagreement with me. please feel free to talk with me. --BlueLankan 19:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueLankan ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In Réunion, the term Indo-Réunionnais is not mainstream. It would be better to have separate articles called Malbars and Zarabes. As for Franco-Réunionnais, it has been coined by Wikipédia. Thierry Caro ( talk) 19:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Again, the two groups would not fare well in separate articles. What has each individual group done to establish different articles? What significance would they have? In fact, Both articles would probably be deleted. This is why:
Together, they have more influence. The population of both groups is more significant when added together. Similarly, both groups are descended from India. And As a result, have a similar culture, save for Religion. Language too, is a uniting factor. Indians in Réunion as a whole can be researched more easily than as separate groups.
Take away these factors and what are you left with? Very little to go on -- Maurice45 ( talk) 21:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I have created Tamil Réunionnais quoting few lines from this article. Any how there is lot of variations between Tamils or called as Malabars in Reunion and North Indians. So I created this page. if any one having disagreement with me. please feel free to talk with me. --BlueLankan 19:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueLankan ( talk • contribs)