This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indian state government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
@ Royal711: Hi. This article is meant to cover only the state government responses. So please don't add anything out of the article scope. Kindly only add what was done by govt. and state to combat the virus. Thanks for the efforts! Shanze1 ( talk) 12:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
So now that the PM has ordered total lockdown of the country, I'm not sure what we should do with the table here. His order must supersede all existing regulations of state govts'. So should we remove the table, modify it in someway or keep it this way (since it is about state-wise decisions) and add central response too. I feel like just removing it :/. What do all you suggest?
@
Mr.Mani Raj Paul:
@
TheRichardPinto:
@
SaiP:
@
Brown Chocolate:
@
Mayankj429:
Shanze1 (
talk)
15:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Shanze1 You must be correct. The thing is, I am a kid in hurry, preparing for JEE, who should have pen and paper now. How much decision state would take? How important they would be to add in wiki article? I am certainly talking about creating a section in that page about state government decisions. I am bit immature to know about this government things. You all are more experienced, you know that better.
@ Mr.Mani Raj Paul:@ TheRichardPinto:@ SaiP:@ Mayankj429: @ DiplomatTesterMan: @ Kautilya3: would you guys please share your opinion? Brown Chocolate ( talk) 03:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
I think the state responses article should be as it is... Only its title should be changed to something like "state responses before complete nationwide lockdown". Also, Janta Curfew article should be merged into the main article as the event was a one time thing and most probably won't be repeated again. TheRichardPinto ( talk) 03:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
The table lists state level regulations that are currently imposed by the respective state and central governments before 24 March, but on 24 March, PM Modi announced complete lockdown in mid night.
please do not remove table ( Mr.Mani Raj Paul ( talk) 03:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC))
Mr.Mani Raj Paul, TheRichardPinto, Shanze1, Brown Chocolate, DTM, and Mayankj429: Hello guys. My apologies. I was busy getting essentials for home. I hope you understand. As far as the suggestion is concerned, with my experience in writing IEEE articles, I would suggest that we keep the main article crisp and short. It should only summarise. The details about lockdown can be included in Indian local government response to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic by changing the title to Indian federal, state, and local government response to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic. In that way, we can cover all types of lockdown and curfews in one article and we can link the same in the main article. Let the table be intact. As per other editors, we can keep the table intact saying this was before PM announced the 3-week lockdown. Request your opinions on my comment. Thank you. SaiP ( talk) 07:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: |last2=
has numeric name (
help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: CS1 maint: others (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: |first3=
has numeric name (
help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
TGcurfew
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).The article name does not reflect its content accurately. Since this is the state government's repsonse not the local governments For reference: [1]. Should we change the name? Tanyasingh ( talk) 04:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
References
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indian state government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
@ Royal711: Hi. This article is meant to cover only the state government responses. So please don't add anything out of the article scope. Kindly only add what was done by govt. and state to combat the virus. Thanks for the efforts! Shanze1 ( talk) 12:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
So now that the PM has ordered total lockdown of the country, I'm not sure what we should do with the table here. His order must supersede all existing regulations of state govts'. So should we remove the table, modify it in someway or keep it this way (since it is about state-wise decisions) and add central response too. I feel like just removing it :/. What do all you suggest?
@
Mr.Mani Raj Paul:
@
TheRichardPinto:
@
SaiP:
@
Brown Chocolate:
@
Mayankj429:
Shanze1 (
talk)
15:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Shanze1 You must be correct. The thing is, I am a kid in hurry, preparing for JEE, who should have pen and paper now. How much decision state would take? How important they would be to add in wiki article? I am certainly talking about creating a section in that page about state government decisions. I am bit immature to know about this government things. You all are more experienced, you know that better.
@ Mr.Mani Raj Paul:@ TheRichardPinto:@ SaiP:@ Mayankj429: @ DiplomatTesterMan: @ Kautilya3: would you guys please share your opinion? Brown Chocolate ( talk) 03:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
I think the state responses article should be as it is... Only its title should be changed to something like "state responses before complete nationwide lockdown". Also, Janta Curfew article should be merged into the main article as the event was a one time thing and most probably won't be repeated again. TheRichardPinto ( talk) 03:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
The table lists state level regulations that are currently imposed by the respective state and central governments before 24 March, but on 24 March, PM Modi announced complete lockdown in mid night.
please do not remove table ( Mr.Mani Raj Paul ( talk) 03:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC))
Mr.Mani Raj Paul, TheRichardPinto, Shanze1, Brown Chocolate, DTM, and Mayankj429: Hello guys. My apologies. I was busy getting essentials for home. I hope you understand. As far as the suggestion is concerned, with my experience in writing IEEE articles, I would suggest that we keep the main article crisp and short. It should only summarise. The details about lockdown can be included in Indian local government response to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic by changing the title to Indian federal, state, and local government response to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic. In that way, we can cover all types of lockdown and curfews in one article and we can link the same in the main article. Let the table be intact. As per other editors, we can keep the table intact saying this was before PM announced the 3-week lockdown. Request your opinions on my comment. Thank you. SaiP ( talk) 07:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: |last2=
has numeric name (
help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite news}}
: CS1 maint: others (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: |first3=
has numeric name (
help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (
link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
TGcurfew
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).The article name does not reflect its content accurately. Since this is the state government's repsonse not the local governments For reference: [1]. Should we change the name? Tanyasingh ( talk) 04:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
References