This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Indian Territory in the American Civil War appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 320 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Since the concept of "Oklahoma" didn't even exist until the 1890's, it's pretty ridiculous to use the name in reference to an event in the past. It's equivalent to "USSR in the Napoleonic Wars" or "Czech Republic in WWII". Meaningless. I'm requesting a move to "Indian Territory in the American Civil War" which is currently protected for some reason. BusterD ( talk) 09:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Alright, I moved it per consensus here and MOS guidelines. I also took the liberty of doing some fairly extensive work on the article. Thanks again to Bedford for the great start. Okiefromokla questions? 17:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian Territory in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
The map is labeled "Map of the Confederate States, including the Union-aligned border states [...]." with border states Missouri and Kentucky, which never joined the Confederacy, undifferentiated from the actual states of the Confederacy. The map is incorrectly drawn, and the label "Map of the Confederate States, including the Union-aligned border states" is a completely contradictory nonsequitur. If a state remained aligned with the Union, it wasn't a Confederate state, pure and simple. 99.111.255.214 ( talk) 18:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Indian Territory in the American Civil War appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 320 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Since the concept of "Oklahoma" didn't even exist until the 1890's, it's pretty ridiculous to use the name in reference to an event in the past. It's equivalent to "USSR in the Napoleonic Wars" or "Czech Republic in WWII". Meaningless. I'm requesting a move to "Indian Territory in the American Civil War" which is currently protected for some reason. BusterD ( talk) 09:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Alright, I moved it per consensus here and MOS guidelines. I also took the liberty of doing some fairly extensive work on the article. Thanks again to Bedford for the great start. Okiefromokla questions? 17:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian Territory in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
The map is labeled "Map of the Confederate States, including the Union-aligned border states [...]." with border states Missouri and Kentucky, which never joined the Confederacy, undifferentiated from the actual states of the Confederacy. The map is incorrectly drawn, and the label "Map of the Confederate States, including the Union-aligned border states" is a completely contradictory nonsequitur. If a state remained aligned with the Union, it wasn't a Confederate state, pure and simple. 99.111.255.214 ( talk) 18:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)