This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This version of the article can in no way be termed as a 'C' violation and so I need not ask anyone's permission before starting the page.
I am sure that someone will delete this also saying that this is a 'stub'.
The editing of pages nowadays have actually started bordering upon 'vandalism'.
I have a picture of the building inauguration, so will upload the same when I reach New Delhi in a few days. So please do not deleted the article saying that there is no source that Nehru inaugurated the institution. DebashisM ( talk) 19:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) -- DebashisM ( talk) 19:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I gain nothing from promoting the organisation (although I am a member of the same).
Its a premier organisation for international law and regularly organizes the Henry Dunant moot court competitions in India.
I would like someone reads the talk page, reply to my issues and then wait for answers before he decides to remove the page.
If not I would not rate the brains of the admins to be more than the 'bots' they rely upon.
Further, in my recent presentation in WikiConference India I advocated the use of WikiMedia even by the judiciary, but I find that there are actually the lacunae of being mechanical in the edits which creates confusion. DebashisM ( talk) 19:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
(Plus, most editors don't appreciate being referred to as 'bots' or 'lacunae'. We try to assume good faith where we can.) §everal⇒| Times 19:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
This article hasn't been proposed for deletion as a copyright violation ...
I don't know who placed the notability tag, but despite showing its webpage, as well as the Govt. of India notification, it appears that people are hell bent on deleting this article. Yeah, I have been given a week to improve this time atleast... DebashisM ( talk) 04:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
"notablility is very strongly asserted and independent sources are readily available" — are we talking about the same article? Where is it "very strongly" asserted? What independent sources are there available without me having to go and google it? What is stopping me from taking this to AFD on grounds of WP:ORG and WP:SOURCES? If this article can be improved then it should be done in the very near future. — Jean Calleo ( talk) 19:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This version of the article can in no way be termed as a 'C' violation and so I need not ask anyone's permission before starting the page.
I am sure that someone will delete this also saying that this is a 'stub'.
The editing of pages nowadays have actually started bordering upon 'vandalism'.
I have a picture of the building inauguration, so will upload the same when I reach New Delhi in a few days. So please do not deleted the article saying that there is no source that Nehru inaugurated the institution. DebashisM ( talk) 19:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) -- DebashisM ( talk) 19:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I gain nothing from promoting the organisation (although I am a member of the same).
Its a premier organisation for international law and regularly organizes the Henry Dunant moot court competitions in India.
I would like someone reads the talk page, reply to my issues and then wait for answers before he decides to remove the page.
If not I would not rate the brains of the admins to be more than the 'bots' they rely upon.
Further, in my recent presentation in WikiConference India I advocated the use of WikiMedia even by the judiciary, but I find that there are actually the lacunae of being mechanical in the edits which creates confusion. DebashisM ( talk) 19:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
(Plus, most editors don't appreciate being referred to as 'bots' or 'lacunae'. We try to assume good faith where we can.) §everal⇒| Times 19:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
This article hasn't been proposed for deletion as a copyright violation ...
I don't know who placed the notability tag, but despite showing its webpage, as well as the Govt. of India notification, it appears that people are hell bent on deleting this article. Yeah, I have been given a week to improve this time atleast... DebashisM ( talk) 04:20, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
"notablility is very strongly asserted and independent sources are readily available" — are we talking about the same article? Where is it "very strongly" asserted? What independent sources are there available without me having to go and google it? What is stopping me from taking this to AFD on grounds of WP:ORG and WP:SOURCES? If this article can be improved then it should be done in the very near future. — Jean Calleo ( talk) 19:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)