Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 16 March 2017 |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indian National Congress article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Indian National Congress was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Indian National Congress. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Indian National Congress at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with India National Congress on May 2020. The result of the discussion ( permanent link) was Oppose merge. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Someone has added Social Democracy Template. Contemporary INC and their policies, especially Under Rao and Singh has nowhere mentioned of Social Democracy. As of now removing the template. Please do not add simply considering Nehru's era. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 09:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Indian National Congress is economically more liberal especially during Manmohan Singh and PV Rao's era. So, economic liberalism suits more than social democracy. In NCERT book it's written it supports economic reforms and is centrist. Social democracy is more leftist ideology rather than centrist. Gundaraaj ( talk) 16:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Congress economic policies is assimilation of social democracy and economic reforms. So, it best describes it. ਰਾਜ ਪਾਲ ( talk) 05:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
For the last few days, the infobox of this article has been changed back and forth often enough. Per the article note, we should gain consensus on the edits before making a change in the ideology section.
ਰਾਜ ਪਾਲ, please consider reverting your addition of Third way and only add it once we have consensus.
Gundaraaj, in your revert, you removed Social democracy from the infobox. Can you show where the discussion and consensus for removing it is?
Thanks!
I will try to take a pass on the article, see if I can locate the previous consensus for all the points listed in ideology. Else it might be good to do a general poll for all the ideologies that should be listed Soni ( talk) 07:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Congress has been Left-wing [1] [2] for a while under the new leadership. Also @ Gundaraaj stop removing Socialism [3] from ideology. Witchilich ( talk) 13:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
References
He is filling the vacuum that India's had for an immensely long period of time — a charismatic national leader on the left who talks about the struggles of the working class, the dispossessed, the marginalised, the women, the unemployed youth. This boisterously radical version of RaGa – which some of his critics have branded a repeat of V.P. Singh — both reflects and paves the way for a broader turn to the left in the depths of society.
That leaves the centre, which had become India's default option under the Congress's inclusive political umbrella since Pandit Nehru became the prime minister, although it was always Left-leaning.
Cite error: There are <ref group=nb>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=nb}}
template (see the
help page).
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Restrictions placed: 16 March 2017 |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Indian National Congress article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Indian National Congress was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Indian National Congress. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Indian National Congress at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with India National Congress on May 2020. The result of the discussion ( permanent link) was Oppose merge. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Someone has added Social Democracy Template. Contemporary INC and their policies, especially Under Rao and Singh has nowhere mentioned of Social Democracy. As of now removing the template. Please do not add simply considering Nehru's era. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 09:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Indian National Congress is economically more liberal especially during Manmohan Singh and PV Rao's era. So, economic liberalism suits more than social democracy. In NCERT book it's written it supports economic reforms and is centrist. Social democracy is more leftist ideology rather than centrist. Gundaraaj ( talk) 16:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Congress economic policies is assimilation of social democracy and economic reforms. So, it best describes it. ਰਾਜ ਪਾਲ ( talk) 05:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
For the last few days, the infobox of this article has been changed back and forth often enough. Per the article note, we should gain consensus on the edits before making a change in the ideology section.
ਰਾਜ ਪਾਲ, please consider reverting your addition of Third way and only add it once we have consensus.
Gundaraaj, in your revert, you removed Social democracy from the infobox. Can you show where the discussion and consensus for removing it is?
Thanks!
I will try to take a pass on the article, see if I can locate the previous consensus for all the points listed in ideology. Else it might be good to do a general poll for all the ideologies that should be listed Soni ( talk) 07:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Congress has been Left-wing [1] [2] for a while under the new leadership. Also @ Gundaraaj stop removing Socialism [3] from ideology. Witchilich ( talk) 13:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
References
He is filling the vacuum that India's had for an immensely long period of time — a charismatic national leader on the left who talks about the struggles of the working class, the dispossessed, the marginalised, the women, the unemployed youth. This boisterously radical version of RaGa – which some of his critics have branded a repeat of V.P. Singh — both reflects and paves the way for a broader turn to the left in the depths of society.
That leaves the centre, which had become India's default option under the Congress's inclusive political umbrella since Pandit Nehru became the prime minister, although it was always Left-leaning.
Cite error: There are <ref group=nb>
tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=nb}}
template (see the
help page).