![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Hi Deepak, just removed a line after Arindam Chaudhuri's name. I'm sure you'll understand why if you see the last saved version. Also, with respect to the BT ranking, a small clarification. The First Favourite category has IIPM standing as joint 7th and not 11th or 10th. I changed that also. Do feel free to change it back if you think it's confusing. Regards & Thanks, Mrinal 203.76.140.130 12:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
I have just read a scan of the BT ranking at http://www.iipm.edu/iipm-b-school-ranking.html. Note here that IIPM Delhi and Mumbai gets a 2006 BEI score of 0.66 and 0.71, which are rank #27 and #26 respectively, comparing figures for 2006. If I'm right, that should be the ranking then? I will get myself a copy of the magazine today to confirm. Deepakshenoy 11:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC) (Hi Deepak, the figures you see are just BEI scores and are only indicative of the Brand Equity Index value of the brand. For example, FMS or Bimtech would have different ranks if one were to go just by BEI. But the ranking is done overall on weighted averages. You could perhaps see the page in BT which shows how the ranks were given. Regards and thanks, Mrinal 203.76.140.130 12:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)) Or perhaps Business Today simply made a big copy mistake:-):-):-): The yellow colour perhaps refers to year 2005, and the red colour to year 2006...and not what is printed (vice versa). But still, I'll call up BT's office in Jhandewalan. Mrinal 61.16.233.194 14:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
This is a request. Kindly do not revert to past versions without leaving a comment or opening a discussion. We repeat, it's a request that you should leave comments that summarise the changes made and make them open for peer review (like had been done with respect to including the Business Today ranking). We're forced to revert back to the version which contains IIPM's latest BT ranking. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.16.233.194 ( talk • contribs) .
The 7th ranking across India is actually 8th, and includes not only recruiters' responses, but also current MBAs, MBA wannabes, Functional Heads, Working Executives... Ed Team/// —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.16.233.194 ( talk • contribs) .
I feel it's very pertinent to now update this page with the latest B-school ranking by India's largest and most credible business magazine, Business Today (research by A.C. Nielsen, ORG Marg). BT has ranked IIPM New Delhi no. 5 across India (as per MBA students), No. 7 across India (as per recruiters), No. 11 (overall). IIPM Mumbai has been ranked 16. I don't have a log-in, but would appreciate the peer review and authentication of this information that I have put up. Regards... Mrinal Sinha —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.16.233.194 ( talk • contribs) .
After many days of peer review, I request again that somebody should put up the actual link in Hindustan Times Business Page that mentions that the Belgium Education Ministry says that IMI Degrees do not fall under the same gamut of recognition as other university degrees in Belgium, Europe. Though Hindustan Times had been mentioned, unfortunately, till the time the actual link is put up, which directly relates to the web site of Hindustan Times, it'll be tough for the information to be put up beyond a reasonable amount of time for peer review. Request again that somebody with access to online HT could link up the news and restore the past version. Thanks... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.76.140.130 ( talk • contribs) .
<<<<A note: The seminars of IIPM are very much for their own students. It is misleading on your part to comment that anybody can sit in these seminars. I guess you are confusing the seminars with the corporate workshops that IIPM conducts for companies across India>>>> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.16.233.196 ( talk • contribs)
I have issues with something mentioned in the GOP section -
IIPM organizes lectures by over 30 professors from the worlds top 15 b-schools such as Harvard, Columbia, Wharton, Stanford etc for its students.
IIPM has also arranged exclusive seminars for their students by Leadership expert and author of 'The 7 Habits of Highly effective people' Stephen Covey.....
It is misleading to term these lectures and seminars as "exclusive for students". IIPM conducts these seminars are events for whoever wants to attend them after paying an entry fees, which IIPM terms as "investment". Since anyone who can pay the fees can attend the lectures, they are hardly "exclusive for their students". In fact IIPM advertises these seminars in all leading newspapers.
Proposed edit - Deleting the words I have made bold, and removing any insinuation that the foreign professors are flown in exclusively for IIPM students. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponytailsnipper ( talk • contribs)
Have re-added some information about the publications - we need some details, surely. If the details are too sketchy, feel free to add more detail. It turns out that all the earlier (four) journals are now consolidated into one magazine, 4Ps. I have added the link.
Further note that "Business and Economy" is not published by IIPM, but by Planman media. There seem to be links with IIPM but nothing is clear about who owns who. I have therefore removed the magazine's mention. Deepakshenoy 11:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Have added a section about Students' feedback. The IIPM Students union has started a website which details the students' perspective about all the relevant issues. Makrandjoshi 03:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
LISTEN MR. NOBODY... LET US TELL YOU THAT WE ARE EXISTING STUDENTS OF IIPM FINAL YEAR AND ALL THAT IS POSTED ON THE WEBSITE IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE. OUR COURSE IS STILL ONGOING AND HENCE WE CANNOT REVEAL OURSELVES.AS FAR AS OUT IDENTITY IS CONCERNED DO GO AHEAD AND WRITE AN EMAIL ON OUR OFFICIAL ID. WE HAVE ALREADY APPROACHED THE PM OFFICE, THE PRESIDENT OFFICE, AICTE, UGC, NGOS AND OTHER MINISTRIES FOR JUSTICE. WE ARE SIMPLY WAITING FOR THE APPROPRIATE TIME. WE HOPE THAT WE HAVE MADE OURSELVES VERY CLEAR..... AND PLEASE STOP SUPPORTING THE FRAUD INSTITUTE. VERY SOON WE WILL POST MORE RELEVANT MATTER ON THE WEBSITE. KEEP WATCHING.' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iipmstudentsunion ( talk • contribs) .
Hi Makrand and others... This is for sure that Deepak works for IIPM and Planman consulting, cause he is the one who is reluctant in removing the reality links on IIPM and moreover if you think that you are a big researcher...then please understand that you do not know IIPM more than us- the students who are actually a part of it now....OK. You may remove our link as the site allows easy edit but remember that the other search engines of google, yahoo, search etc. list us promptly. You are the one who is indeed trying to hide reality facts of IIPM from genuine students. No problem.... Do your best and we will do ours. Enough of IIPM playing with the lives of students....—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iipmstudentsunion ( talk • contribs) .
The main degrees offered are those in planning and entrepreurship, which IIPM clarifies are non-professional and non-technical courses. The degrees awarded by IMI Europe are extra. Thus these should not be mentioned in the intro, but in a separate para. Hindustan Times, Mumbai Editiion May 21st 2006, Page 17 (business page) had a story about higher education in which the reporter has written that he got a mail from the Education ministry of Belgium (where IMI is located) saying that the institute or its degrees are not reognised in Belgium, and in Europe. I am mentioning this in the separate section Makrandjoshi 10:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
It was looking like an advertorial, listing descriptions of the magazine and several names as "contributors". The articles are all syndicated, and any magazine can buy them. The para here gave the impression that Chomsky, Rumsfeld etc write "for" IIPM's magazines which is not correct. Going into too much detail about the magazines and passing value judgements like "leading magazine" and "competing with BW, BT" etc is marketingspeak and not at all encyclopaedic. I have made the edits I felt necessary. Deepak, do give them a once-over. Makrandjoshi 06:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Can the person who put the NPOV tag please mention specific areas where there seems to be a problem with NPOV? Please go through the talk archives too, and if there's still an NPOV there let's fix it. If there is no reply in a week I will remove the NPOV tag. Deepakshenoy 11:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Hi Deepak, just removed a line after Arindam Chaudhuri's name. I'm sure you'll understand why if you see the last saved version. Also, with respect to the BT ranking, a small clarification. The First Favourite category has IIPM standing as joint 7th and not 11th or 10th. I changed that also. Do feel free to change it back if you think it's confusing. Regards & Thanks, Mrinal 203.76.140.130 12:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
I have just read a scan of the BT ranking at http://www.iipm.edu/iipm-b-school-ranking.html. Note here that IIPM Delhi and Mumbai gets a 2006 BEI score of 0.66 and 0.71, which are rank #27 and #26 respectively, comparing figures for 2006. If I'm right, that should be the ranking then? I will get myself a copy of the magazine today to confirm. Deepakshenoy 11:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC) (Hi Deepak, the figures you see are just BEI scores and are only indicative of the Brand Equity Index value of the brand. For example, FMS or Bimtech would have different ranks if one were to go just by BEI. But the ranking is done overall on weighted averages. You could perhaps see the page in BT which shows how the ranks were given. Regards and thanks, Mrinal 203.76.140.130 12:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)) Or perhaps Business Today simply made a big copy mistake:-):-):-): The yellow colour perhaps refers to year 2005, and the red colour to year 2006...and not what is printed (vice versa). But still, I'll call up BT's office in Jhandewalan. Mrinal 61.16.233.194 14:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
This is a request. Kindly do not revert to past versions without leaving a comment or opening a discussion. We repeat, it's a request that you should leave comments that summarise the changes made and make them open for peer review (like had been done with respect to including the Business Today ranking). We're forced to revert back to the version which contains IIPM's latest BT ranking. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.16.233.194 ( talk • contribs) .
The 7th ranking across India is actually 8th, and includes not only recruiters' responses, but also current MBAs, MBA wannabes, Functional Heads, Working Executives... Ed Team/// —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.16.233.194 ( talk • contribs) .
I feel it's very pertinent to now update this page with the latest B-school ranking by India's largest and most credible business magazine, Business Today (research by A.C. Nielsen, ORG Marg). BT has ranked IIPM New Delhi no. 5 across India (as per MBA students), No. 7 across India (as per recruiters), No. 11 (overall). IIPM Mumbai has been ranked 16. I don't have a log-in, but would appreciate the peer review and authentication of this information that I have put up. Regards... Mrinal Sinha —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.16.233.194 ( talk • contribs) .
After many days of peer review, I request again that somebody should put up the actual link in Hindustan Times Business Page that mentions that the Belgium Education Ministry says that IMI Degrees do not fall under the same gamut of recognition as other university degrees in Belgium, Europe. Though Hindustan Times had been mentioned, unfortunately, till the time the actual link is put up, which directly relates to the web site of Hindustan Times, it'll be tough for the information to be put up beyond a reasonable amount of time for peer review. Request again that somebody with access to online HT could link up the news and restore the past version. Thanks... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.76.140.130 ( talk • contribs) .
<<<<A note: The seminars of IIPM are very much for their own students. It is misleading on your part to comment that anybody can sit in these seminars. I guess you are confusing the seminars with the corporate workshops that IIPM conducts for companies across India>>>> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.16.233.196 ( talk • contribs)
I have issues with something mentioned in the GOP section -
IIPM organizes lectures by over 30 professors from the worlds top 15 b-schools such as Harvard, Columbia, Wharton, Stanford etc for its students.
IIPM has also arranged exclusive seminars for their students by Leadership expert and author of 'The 7 Habits of Highly effective people' Stephen Covey.....
It is misleading to term these lectures and seminars as "exclusive for students". IIPM conducts these seminars are events for whoever wants to attend them after paying an entry fees, which IIPM terms as "investment". Since anyone who can pay the fees can attend the lectures, they are hardly "exclusive for their students". In fact IIPM advertises these seminars in all leading newspapers.
Proposed edit - Deleting the words I have made bold, and removing any insinuation that the foreign professors are flown in exclusively for IIPM students. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ponytailsnipper ( talk • contribs)
Have re-added some information about the publications - we need some details, surely. If the details are too sketchy, feel free to add more detail. It turns out that all the earlier (four) journals are now consolidated into one magazine, 4Ps. I have added the link.
Further note that "Business and Economy" is not published by IIPM, but by Planman media. There seem to be links with IIPM but nothing is clear about who owns who. I have therefore removed the magazine's mention. Deepakshenoy 11:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Have added a section about Students' feedback. The IIPM Students union has started a website which details the students' perspective about all the relevant issues. Makrandjoshi 03:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
LISTEN MR. NOBODY... LET US TELL YOU THAT WE ARE EXISTING STUDENTS OF IIPM FINAL YEAR AND ALL THAT IS POSTED ON THE WEBSITE IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE. OUR COURSE IS STILL ONGOING AND HENCE WE CANNOT REVEAL OURSELVES.AS FAR AS OUT IDENTITY IS CONCERNED DO GO AHEAD AND WRITE AN EMAIL ON OUR OFFICIAL ID. WE HAVE ALREADY APPROACHED THE PM OFFICE, THE PRESIDENT OFFICE, AICTE, UGC, NGOS AND OTHER MINISTRIES FOR JUSTICE. WE ARE SIMPLY WAITING FOR THE APPROPRIATE TIME. WE HOPE THAT WE HAVE MADE OURSELVES VERY CLEAR..... AND PLEASE STOP SUPPORTING THE FRAUD INSTITUTE. VERY SOON WE WILL POST MORE RELEVANT MATTER ON THE WEBSITE. KEEP WATCHING.' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iipmstudentsunion ( talk • contribs) .
Hi Makrand and others... This is for sure that Deepak works for IIPM and Planman consulting, cause he is the one who is reluctant in removing the reality links on IIPM and moreover if you think that you are a big researcher...then please understand that you do not know IIPM more than us- the students who are actually a part of it now....OK. You may remove our link as the site allows easy edit but remember that the other search engines of google, yahoo, search etc. list us promptly. You are the one who is indeed trying to hide reality facts of IIPM from genuine students. No problem.... Do your best and we will do ours. Enough of IIPM playing with the lives of students....—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iipmstudentsunion ( talk • contribs) .
The main degrees offered are those in planning and entrepreurship, which IIPM clarifies are non-professional and non-technical courses. The degrees awarded by IMI Europe are extra. Thus these should not be mentioned in the intro, but in a separate para. Hindustan Times, Mumbai Editiion May 21st 2006, Page 17 (business page) had a story about higher education in which the reporter has written that he got a mail from the Education ministry of Belgium (where IMI is located) saying that the institute or its degrees are not reognised in Belgium, and in Europe. I am mentioning this in the separate section Makrandjoshi 10:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
It was looking like an advertorial, listing descriptions of the magazine and several names as "contributors". The articles are all syndicated, and any magazine can buy them. The para here gave the impression that Chomsky, Rumsfeld etc write "for" IIPM's magazines which is not correct. Going into too much detail about the magazines and passing value judgements like "leading magazine" and "competing with BW, BT" etc is marketingspeak and not at all encyclopaedic. I have made the edits I felt necessary. Deepak, do give them a once-over. Makrandjoshi 06:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Can the person who put the NPOV tag please mention specific areas where there seems to be a problem with NPOV? Please go through the talk archives too, and if there's still an NPOV there let's fix it. If there is no reply in a week I will remove the NPOV tag. Deepakshenoy 11:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)