Indian Institute of Management Lucknow has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
... and not "Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow". The word "Lucknow" forms part of the name, and there is no comma that separates it from "Indian Institute of Management".
Should we claim that Manfest is one of the best in India or should we rather place it somewhere between the events of the best b schools like harvard, standford etc? Students here are undoubtedly the best in corpo india. how about the world? doles 13:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Have removed a lot of other NPOV matter like "best infrastructure among the world's B-schools. The page has been marked for speedy deletion. Someone please check my edits and remove the notice if the speedy deletion criteria is no longer met. kapitanniemand 21:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:IIML.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:FAUNA - 1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:DRAGON IIML2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
The article does not contain any secondary reliable sources. Kindly add the same as unreferenced statements can be deleted. Wireless Fidelity Class One ( talk 18:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I have a direct conflict of Interest about having added Amitabh Thakur's name among noted Alumni but I strongly feel that he has enough credentials to deserve a place there. Let someone else make the final decision. nutanthakurlko Nutanthakurlko ( talk) 02:51, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
I am in the process of searching for reliable sources and placing information only if the same is validated by reliable sources. As my previous request to the editors of the page was not responded to, I have removed all information that is without sourcing. Some of it also had copy violation issues directly from IIM Lucknow blog sites. Kindly do not copy paste material from the net. If there's an exceptional claim, kindly add that only after you have ensured that the claim is backed by reliable sources. Beyond that, you could follow some of the work that I shall initiate on the page and learn how to add reliable sources and how to paraphrase statements. If you require any support whatsoever, please feel free to write to me on my talk page. Kind regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:43, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
I am a student of IIM Lucknow. If you find any of my edits to this article as biased or not written from a neutral point of view, please notify me or make appropriate changes yourself. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 09:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
In good faith towards Anbu's self disclosure and his request to me on his talk page, I've removed the COI tag. I suggest we proceed step by step. First the lead section.
Once we've addressed these issues, I'll move to the next sections. Thanks. Wifione Message 06:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
References have been added and CAT is moved to separate sub section -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 09:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I think its OK to remove the festivals from the lead. There are many sources for the social relevancy statement, but all of them quote the IIML's press release. I am searching for an independent source-- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I couldn't get independent secondary source for that statement. Lets move on. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 21:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
I've changed the statements to match exactly what is given in the citations provided. If you feel anything has been missed out, do mention. Thanks. Wifione Message 19:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I have added the missed out part.-- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I haven't really worked on article assessments, but how about the following:
Done. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Most of the sources are primary sources. The material that is referenced from these sources is not necessarily fact. For example: "is located in an isolated serene area". How can I be sure that the area is "serene"?
Looking at the sources it seems that books have been forgotten. Books are a great source of information and referencing, and people are bound to have written books on IIML. The only job is to find them and use them as references. Google books should be helpful in that.
All in all, this article needs lots of good references (which shouldn't be too tough to find), and some redundancy, spelling, grammar checks.
Articles from National newspapers used as secondary sources.Could not find books. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
PS:As an exception, "Referred to as 'Hel(L)' by the students,[5] the rigorous lifestyle at IIM Lucknow is packed with academics, extracurriculars and entertainment." seems a clear (student) POV to me.-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 04:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Changed. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Response for your concerns on
1)so called 'editorially unacceptable sources':- Please read the source before tagging it as editorially unacceptable. The Pagalguy.com reference is not an editorial source at all. The source is an interview with the director of IIM Lucknow. I have added another reference to support the same statement. Also read the sentence for which the source is used and then give a valid reason why do you think the information in the source could be wrong.
2)Self Published sources for library, board of governors, etc:- Do you expect a Times of India reporter to go to IIM Lucknow Library and count the number of books there? As I already mentioned to you, there are around 20 college/university FAs in Wikipedia and all of them are written with Self Published sources. In most of the FAs, 50% of the references are self published sources. In this article only 35% of the references are self published. Please understand that it is impossible to write an article on a college/university without self published sources. WP:UNIGUIDE says Self published sources are reliable for authoritative facts. If IIM Lucknow website says so and so is the chairman of the board of Governors, it is an authoritative fact and it has to be accepted on the face value.
3)Promotional sounding peacock statement:- I didn't included this statement. An IP did. I have changed it now.
4)Lawns and Trees:- I have included references for them.
-- Anbu121 ( talk me) 14:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TheSpecialUser ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Happy to help. TheSpecialUser TSU 15:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
TheSpecialUser TSU 08:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Few more fixes
Good to go for GA. I'd still like to have a look for 1a criteria and will give out final issues about the prose by tonight. Cheers! TheSpecialUser TSU 22:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
This is it! TheSpecialUser TSU 21:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian Institute of Management Lucknow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 34 external links on Indian Institute of Management Lucknow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/media/2009/Newsletter_July2009.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ganga.iiml.ac.in/~librarian/location.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/centres_of_excellence_innovation_incubation.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://iiml.org/nostaLgia2010/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Event_Details.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/media/2009/Newsletter_July2009.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/Tourism/patanjali.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/faculty_staff_areawise.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 10:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
... and not "Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow". The word "Lucknow" forms part of the name, and there is no comma that separates it from "Indian Institute of Management".
Should we claim that Manfest is one of the best in India or should we rather place it somewhere between the events of the best b schools like harvard, standford etc? Students here are undoubtedly the best in corpo india. how about the world? doles 13:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Have removed a lot of other NPOV matter like "best infrastructure among the world's B-schools. The page has been marked for speedy deletion. Someone please check my edits and remove the notice if the speedy deletion criteria is no longer met. kapitanniemand 21:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:IIML.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:FAUNA - 1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:DRAGON IIML2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
The article does not contain any secondary reliable sources. Kindly add the same as unreferenced statements can be deleted. Wireless Fidelity Class One ( talk 18:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I have a direct conflict of Interest about having added Amitabh Thakur's name among noted Alumni but I strongly feel that he has enough credentials to deserve a place there. Let someone else make the final decision. nutanthakurlko Nutanthakurlko ( talk) 02:51, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
I am in the process of searching for reliable sources and placing information only if the same is validated by reliable sources. As my previous request to the editors of the page was not responded to, I have removed all information that is without sourcing. Some of it also had copy violation issues directly from IIM Lucknow blog sites. Kindly do not copy paste material from the net. If there's an exceptional claim, kindly add that only after you have ensured that the claim is backed by reliable sources. Beyond that, you could follow some of the work that I shall initiate on the page and learn how to add reliable sources and how to paraphrase statements. If you require any support whatsoever, please feel free to write to me on my talk page. Kind regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:43, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
I am a student of IIM Lucknow. If you find any of my edits to this article as biased or not written from a neutral point of view, please notify me or make appropriate changes yourself. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 09:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
In good faith towards Anbu's self disclosure and his request to me on his talk page, I've removed the COI tag. I suggest we proceed step by step. First the lead section.
Once we've addressed these issues, I'll move to the next sections. Thanks. Wifione Message 06:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
References have been added and CAT is moved to separate sub section -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 09:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I think its OK to remove the festivals from the lead. There are many sources for the social relevancy statement, but all of them quote the IIML's press release. I am searching for an independent source-- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I couldn't get independent secondary source for that statement. Lets move on. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 21:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
I've changed the statements to match exactly what is given in the citations provided. If you feel anything has been missed out, do mention. Thanks. Wifione Message 19:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I have added the missed out part.-- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I haven't really worked on article assessments, but how about the following:
Done. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Most of the sources are primary sources. The material that is referenced from these sources is not necessarily fact. For example: "is located in an isolated serene area". How can I be sure that the area is "serene"?
Looking at the sources it seems that books have been forgotten. Books are a great source of information and referencing, and people are bound to have written books on IIML. The only job is to find them and use them as references. Google books should be helpful in that.
All in all, this article needs lots of good references (which shouldn't be too tough to find), and some redundancy, spelling, grammar checks.
Articles from National newspapers used as secondary sources.Could not find books. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
PS:As an exception, "Referred to as 'Hel(L)' by the students,[5] the rigorous lifestyle at IIM Lucknow is packed with academics, extracurriculars and entertainment." seems a clear (student) POV to me.-- Siddhartha Ghai ( talk) 04:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Changed. -- Anbu121 ( talk me) 11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Response for your concerns on
1)so called 'editorially unacceptable sources':- Please read the source before tagging it as editorially unacceptable. The Pagalguy.com reference is not an editorial source at all. The source is an interview with the director of IIM Lucknow. I have added another reference to support the same statement. Also read the sentence for which the source is used and then give a valid reason why do you think the information in the source could be wrong.
2)Self Published sources for library, board of governors, etc:- Do you expect a Times of India reporter to go to IIM Lucknow Library and count the number of books there? As I already mentioned to you, there are around 20 college/university FAs in Wikipedia and all of them are written with Self Published sources. In most of the FAs, 50% of the references are self published sources. In this article only 35% of the references are self published. Please understand that it is impossible to write an article on a college/university without self published sources. WP:UNIGUIDE says Self published sources are reliable for authoritative facts. If IIM Lucknow website says so and so is the chairman of the board of Governors, it is an authoritative fact and it has to be accepted on the face value.
3)Promotional sounding peacock statement:- I didn't included this statement. An IP did. I have changed it now.
4)Lawns and Trees:- I have included references for them.
-- Anbu121 ( talk me) 14:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TheSpecialUser ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Happy to help. TheSpecialUser TSU 15:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
TheSpecialUser TSU 08:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Few more fixes
Good to go for GA. I'd still like to have a look for 1a criteria and will give out final issues about the prose by tonight. Cheers! TheSpecialUser TSU 22:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
This is it! TheSpecialUser TSU 21:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian Institute of Management Lucknow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 34 external links on Indian Institute of Management Lucknow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/media/2009/Newsletter_July2009.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ganga.iiml.ac.in/~librarian/location.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/centres_of_excellence_innovation_incubation.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://iiml.org/nostaLgia2010/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Event_Details.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/media/2009/Newsletter_July2009.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/Tourism/patanjali.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.iiml.ac.in/faculty_staff_areawise.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 10:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)