This article was nominated for
deletion on 2007-04-25. The result of
the discussion was Keep.
This article is written in
Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This
alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical
indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
Index of Australia-related articles is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The
Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
Inclusion Policy
This sort of list with no extra content can be replaced by a (hierarchy) of categories, can't it? If not, what level of Australian articles should be included? E.g. States, State Capitals, iconic fauna, iconic flaura, ...
I ask because there's clearly many more articles that could be added just to complete the above sets. (
Brisbane and
Adelaide for a start.)
I think list articles like this are a good example of the kind of article that should be replaced with categories - see
Category:Australia. --
Chuq 03:04, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
IMHO each past and present MHR (that has an entry) should should be in the MHRs category, and the category page should point to the list page, which is are useful pages, but serve a different purpose to categories, which are effectively indexes.
Otherwise, to provide similar functionality, every MHR page needs a See also pointing to their relevant list page, which seems silly to me.
BTW I tried to locate the previous Reference desk discussion regarding this topic pointed to from
Category_talk:Australian MHRs but didn't find it. (Google only finds
Talk:John Howard#Category.) Any one have a working link to it?
This article was nominated for
deletion on 2007-04-25. The result of
the discussion was Keep.
This article is written in
Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This
alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical
indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
Index of Australia-related articles is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The
Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
Inclusion Policy
This sort of list with no extra content can be replaced by a (hierarchy) of categories, can't it? If not, what level of Australian articles should be included? E.g. States, State Capitals, iconic fauna, iconic flaura, ...
I ask because there's clearly many more articles that could be added just to complete the above sets. (
Brisbane and
Adelaide for a start.)
I think list articles like this are a good example of the kind of article that should be replaced with categories - see
Category:Australia. --
Chuq 03:04, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
IMHO each past and present MHR (that has an entry) should should be in the MHRs category, and the category page should point to the list page, which is are useful pages, but serve a different purpose to categories, which are effectively indexes.
Otherwise, to provide similar functionality, every MHR page needs a See also pointing to their relevant list page, which seems silly to me.
BTW I tried to locate the previous Reference desk discussion regarding this topic pointed to from
Category_talk:Australian MHRs but didn't find it. (Google only finds
Talk:John Howard#Category.) Any one have a working link to it?