Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters ( talk) 14:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   There were a few punctuation errors, which I have fixed.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

   Article is properly referenced and has no WP:OR.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Article covers all major aspects and is focused.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article complies to WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are properly tagged and captioned.

7. Overall: It is not often that I pass an article after one read, but this article is one of those times. There were a few minor punctuation errors and I have fixed them. Otherwise, this article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I am happy to pass it. Well done! – SMasters ( talk) 14:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC) reply

   Pass/Fail: