This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Impeachment March article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Impeachment March has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 11, 2018. ( Reviewed version).

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Donald Trump Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 13, 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force. United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

There is a request, submitted by -- Another Believer ( Talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Good article on English Wikipedia".

@ Opencooper: I think the spoken Wikipedia recording you've removed is better than nothing. Why did you remove? Has there been a discussion about these being problematic? --- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 19:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

From their recent contributions it looks like they are mass-removing these recordings... Funcrunch ( talk) 19:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

See also:

• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spoken_Wikipedia/Archive_12#Articles_being_read_out_by_AI_voices/screen_readers?
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spoken_Wikipedia#Bulk_removals?

I dunno, I feel like this needs more discussion. I don't see why these are so problematic, at least until someone makes a human recording. --- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 19:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Another Believer: You say you don't see a problem with this recording, but did you actually listen to it to assess its quality? Right off the bat, it can't even say "protest" right. The emphasis on every single word is off. This was only after listening to half a minute of it. Opencooper ( talk) 04:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply