This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For those who don't know, there's some discussion about how to develop the articles specific to individual immuno methods. If you're interested, join in here. (No need to respond on this page) — eitc h 16:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I've re-written the page from the bottom up. I think it is best mainly left as a set of links to already comprehensive articles on specific immunostaining methods. I'd be tempted to grade it a B, but I'll let other people take a look at what I've done. Dr Aaron 12:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Dr Aaron. Thanks for all of teh work that you've put into the article, but I'm not sure that reducing it to its barest of bones is the best approach. I think that I understand what you were trying to do, but it seems to me that an encyclopedia is supposed to fully explain a subject, especially one as important as immunostaining. What do all of the various immunological techniques have in common? Why do people use them? What are their limits? – Clockwork Soul 06:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
"via dry, semi-dry, or wet blotting methods," what are these methods. I've looked all over the internet and can't get a definitive answer. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.108.203.96 (
talk) 05:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
dry, semi-dry, and wet blotting just refers to the different apparatuses used for blotting. The end result is essentiall the same between the three. -AkD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.231.205 ( talk) 02:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For those who don't know, there's some discussion about how to develop the articles specific to individual immuno methods. If you're interested, join in here. (No need to respond on this page) — eitc h 16:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I've re-written the page from the bottom up. I think it is best mainly left as a set of links to already comprehensive articles on specific immunostaining methods. I'd be tempted to grade it a B, but I'll let other people take a look at what I've done. Dr Aaron 12:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Dr Aaron. Thanks for all of teh work that you've put into the article, but I'm not sure that reducing it to its barest of bones is the best approach. I think that I understand what you were trying to do, but it seems to me that an encyclopedia is supposed to fully explain a subject, especially one as important as immunostaining. What do all of the various immunological techniques have in common? Why do people use them? What are their limits? – Clockwork Soul 06:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
"via dry, semi-dry, or wet blotting methods," what are these methods. I've looked all over the internet and can't get a definitive answer. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.108.203.96 (
talk) 05:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
dry, semi-dry, and wet blotting just refers to the different apparatuses used for blotting. The end result is essentiall the same between the three. -AkD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.231.205 ( talk) 02:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)