This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Done. BD2412 T 15:09, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Some more background perhaps? For example, where did he spend most of his life before he became a foreign exchange student (I guess Kenya but who knows?)? When did he become a foreign exchange student (i.e. at what age did he go to the US) and how long was he there? Perhaps OT but it might be worth mentioning whether he is still in the US or left. Maybe also mention of why he wasn't accepted in Kenya or India (if he was born in Kenya and spent most of his eaerly life there I find it strange that he was not accepted unless his parents were there illegally perhaps, similarly if he was born to Indian parents and spent most of his early life in India, I find it straneg India did not accept him) Nil Einne 14:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
This should be in the introduction........... Bsd987 as anonymous user 65.254.4.231 15:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
A ton of President George W. Bush's signing statements cite this case; see here: [1]. Would this be a good item to add to the article? I'm afraid I don't personally understand why the signing statements repeatedly cite this case, but I'd love to know more. -- Takeel 18:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
This is a good lay out for the SC cases. It does a great job of accurately and concisely laying out the case. I appreciate the quality of this article.
This Wikibrief sets a standard to which all the other case briefs on wiki should be judged.-- Engender ( talk) 23:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
I came here to look at the article based on the notices at WP:SCOTUS and WP:LAW that the article was ready for a GAN. Unfortunately, the article is not only not ready for a GAN, it was assessed too high on the quality standards. First, not all facts asserted are cited, a general guide for B class is that every section is cited to a reference. Second, important details are omitted or lacking in detail, such as the lower court cite (___ F.2d ___), the section of the U.S. Const. that was applicible, the opinion is not in preferred format (see WP:SCOTUS - case outline, subsequent developments covers nothing in the law, etc. I re-assessed a C-class. It needs considerably more work to move to GA glass. GregJackP Boomer! 10:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Done. BD2412 T 15:09, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Some more background perhaps? For example, where did he spend most of his life before he became a foreign exchange student (I guess Kenya but who knows?)? When did he become a foreign exchange student (i.e. at what age did he go to the US) and how long was he there? Perhaps OT but it might be worth mentioning whether he is still in the US or left. Maybe also mention of why he wasn't accepted in Kenya or India (if he was born in Kenya and spent most of his eaerly life there I find it strange that he was not accepted unless his parents were there illegally perhaps, similarly if he was born to Indian parents and spent most of his early life in India, I find it straneg India did not accept him) Nil Einne 14:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
This should be in the introduction........... Bsd987 as anonymous user 65.254.4.231 15:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
A ton of President George W. Bush's signing statements cite this case; see here: [1]. Would this be a good item to add to the article? I'm afraid I don't personally understand why the signing statements repeatedly cite this case, but I'd love to know more. -- Takeel 18:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
This is a good lay out for the SC cases. It does a great job of accurately and concisely laying out the case. I appreciate the quality of this article.
This Wikibrief sets a standard to which all the other case briefs on wiki should be judged.-- Engender ( talk) 23:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
I came here to look at the article based on the notices at WP:SCOTUS and WP:LAW that the article was ready for a GAN. Unfortunately, the article is not only not ready for a GAN, it was assessed too high on the quality standards. First, not all facts asserted are cited, a general guide for B class is that every section is cited to a reference. Second, important details are omitted or lacking in detail, such as the lower court cite (___ F.2d ___), the section of the U.S. Const. that was applicible, the opinion is not in preferred format (see WP:SCOTUS - case outline, subsequent developments covers nothing in the law, etc. I re-assessed a C-class. It needs considerably more work to move to GA glass. GregJackP Boomer! 10:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)