This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article is full of inaccuracies, out-of-date information, it lacks coherence in places and I think contravenes NPOV. I'm not sure what the right template is, but I think that it needs a warning to readers at the top. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 11:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
On second thoughts, the lack of purpose, direction and usefulness of this page leads me to think that any useful and relevant information can be inclued in the Immigration to Australia and Immigration detention in Australia pages. There's already a lot of overlap in these areas. (And daily traffic mostly varies between 3 and 8 per day here.) Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 01:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Oppose neither immigration (225,941 in 2015-16) nor immigration of refugees (24,162 in 2015-16) are synonymous with detention (around 2,500 as at 30 June 2016). There are specific issues related to the health of (1) non-refugee immigrants (better on arrival due to selection criteria, main issues are language & cultural barriers, but also aged care) (2) refugees in the community (previous trauma, but also whether they have access to medicare or other health services) and (3) people in immigration detention (particularly mental health issues associated with detention). Given the number of reliable sources already quoted in the article as well as other government and non-government studies eg [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] to look at the health of Australian residents born overseas I am confident the topic meets general notability guidelines, but am happy to discuss should deletion be proposed. Yes there are plenty of issues with the current content, but that does not mean that the topic should be dismissed as not useful or relevant: see WP:CONTN. Find bruce ( talk) 02:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article is full of inaccuracies, out-of-date information, it lacks coherence in places and I think contravenes NPOV. I'm not sure what the right template is, but I think that it needs a warning to readers at the top. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 11:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
On second thoughts, the lack of purpose, direction and usefulness of this page leads me to think that any useful and relevant information can be inclued in the Immigration to Australia and Immigration detention in Australia pages. There's already a lot of overlap in these areas. (And daily traffic mostly varies between 3 and 8 per day here.) Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 01:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Oppose neither immigration (225,941 in 2015-16) nor immigration of refugees (24,162 in 2015-16) are synonymous with detention (around 2,500 as at 30 June 2016). There are specific issues related to the health of (1) non-refugee immigrants (better on arrival due to selection criteria, main issues are language & cultural barriers, but also aged care) (2) refugees in the community (previous trauma, but also whether they have access to medicare or other health services) and (3) people in immigration detention (particularly mental health issues associated with detention). Given the number of reliable sources already quoted in the article as well as other government and non-government studies eg [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] to look at the health of Australian residents born overseas I am confident the topic meets general notability guidelines, but am happy to discuss should deletion be proposed. Yes there are plenty of issues with the current content, but that does not mean that the topic should be dismissed as not useful or relevant: see WP:CONTN. Find bruce ( talk) 02:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)