![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad ( talk) 17:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
I propose that Trench Foot be merged into Immersion foot syndromes, or vice versa, as trench foot is the most important and more widely known and recognized affliction by far of all three within the category. The other two pages within the category of immersion foot syndromes, tropical immersion foot and warm water immersion foot should also be merged into whichever page is dominant in the end, and I vouch for immersion foot syndromes to be that article, being the category containing the other three. I think that the content in the trench foot article can easily be explained in the context of immersion foot syndromes, and the immersion foot syndromes article is short enough that a merge of either into the other would not create an article of unreasonable length. In fact, of the three articles, only 'trench foot' is of any substantial length; 'immersion foot syndromes doesn't even have prose outside a listing of the three afflictions within. Anon423 ( talk) 05:48, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad ( talk) 17:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
I propose that Trench Foot be merged into Immersion foot syndromes, or vice versa, as trench foot is the most important and more widely known and recognized affliction by far of all three within the category. The other two pages within the category of immersion foot syndromes, tropical immersion foot and warm water immersion foot should also be merged into whichever page is dominant in the end, and I vouch for immersion foot syndromes to be that article, being the category containing the other three. I think that the content in the trench foot article can easily be explained in the context of immersion foot syndromes, and the immersion foot syndromes article is short enough that a merge of either into the other would not create an article of unreasonable length. In fact, of the three articles, only 'trench foot' is of any substantial length; 'immersion foot syndromes doesn't even have prose outside a listing of the three afflictions within. Anon423 ( talk) 05:48, 2 May 2013 (UTC)