From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

He attacks Hegelianism for its pantheism, awering of human personality, and imperfect recognition of demands of the moral consciousness.

I'm pretty sure "awering" is a typo - but for what? Someone who knows Fichte and Hegel better should fix or rephrase it. -- Jim Henry 22:56, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

FIXED: "awering" to "lowering"; cf. Encyclopedia Britannica. Jimaingram 20:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Here's another (in the "Thought" section): "the genius, a higher spiritual individuality existing fan by the side of his lower, earthly individuality." Existing fan? 173.72.111.115 ( talk) 18:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Hans Wurst reply

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

He attacks Hegelianism for its pantheism, awering of human personality, and imperfect recognition of demands of the moral consciousness.

I'm pretty sure "awering" is a typo - but for what? Someone who knows Fichte and Hegel better should fix or rephrase it. -- Jim Henry 22:56, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

FIXED: "awering" to "lowering"; cf. Encyclopedia Britannica. Jimaingram 20:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Here's another (in the "Thought" section): "the genius, a higher spiritual individuality existing fan by the side of his lower, earthly individuality." Existing fan? 173.72.111.115 ( talk) 18:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Hans Wurst reply

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook