This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems to me that connectedness for a digital image is rather distinct from just general "connected." I'd be willing to write up something about this, but I'm not sure if it would be seen as a little too specialized? Is this definition of connectedness too esoteric to add to the "connected" page? Wegsjac 04:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
If any one have a latest information about the topic image segmentation den mail me at my id e-mail address retracted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.240.72.211 ( talk) 08:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
There is a stark lack of images for a topic that could be much more intuitively be explained using diagrams, pictures etc. Admittedly I am not saying that I possess such visuals, merely suggesting this is the direction in which I believe the article should be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.212.199.56 ( talk) 12:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Image segmentation. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Image segmentation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Kindly add the below as a reference to Applications-->Medical Imaging-->Diagnosis, study of anatomical structure. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20172792 Hidasri ( talk) 02:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
To my knowledge, there are at least three kinds of segmentation that are widely studied in computer vision:
So far, Semantic Segmentation and Instance Segmentation do not seem to have a home on Wikipedia. I am thinking of adding a short description of each to the end of this article. I would also incorporate the U-Net paragraph (which is currently in the Trainable segmentation section) into the new Semantic Segmentation section. Given that most of the other sections of this article are various techniques for Image Segmentation, the change of topic to Semantic Segmentation and then Instance Segmentation at the end of the article will be somewhat abrupt.
I will probably do this sometime in the next few weeks, but I first wanted to see if anyone had any alternate suggestions for how to incorporate these topics. 104gli ( talk) 21:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Where would be a good place to write more specifically about image segmentation for biological applications, including a table of existing methods, in particular for microscopy images. Should this article be extended or a new article created? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjrahi ( talk • contribs) 10:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
The section on interactive segmentation reads like an advertisement for a certain lab/academic and not a general method. I think this page would be improved if this section were deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomhallward ( talk • contribs) 02:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems to me that connectedness for a digital image is rather distinct from just general "connected." I'd be willing to write up something about this, but I'm not sure if it would be seen as a little too specialized? Is this definition of connectedness too esoteric to add to the "connected" page? Wegsjac 04:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
If any one have a latest information about the topic image segmentation den mail me at my id e-mail address retracted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.240.72.211 ( talk) 08:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
There is a stark lack of images for a topic that could be much more intuitively be explained using diagrams, pictures etc. Admittedly I am not saying that I possess such visuals, merely suggesting this is the direction in which I believe the article should be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.212.199.56 ( talk) 12:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Image segmentation. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Image segmentation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Kindly add the below as a reference to Applications-->Medical Imaging-->Diagnosis, study of anatomical structure. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20172792 Hidasri ( talk) 02:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
To my knowledge, there are at least three kinds of segmentation that are widely studied in computer vision:
So far, Semantic Segmentation and Instance Segmentation do not seem to have a home on Wikipedia. I am thinking of adding a short description of each to the end of this article. I would also incorporate the U-Net paragraph (which is currently in the Trainable segmentation section) into the new Semantic Segmentation section. Given that most of the other sections of this article are various techniques for Image Segmentation, the change of topic to Semantic Segmentation and then Instance Segmentation at the end of the article will be somewhat abrupt.
I will probably do this sometime in the next few weeks, but I first wanted to see if anyone had any alternate suggestions for how to incorporate these topics. 104gli ( talk) 21:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Where would be a good place to write more specifically about image segmentation for biological applications, including a table of existing methods, in particular for microscopy images. Should this article be extended or a new article created? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjrahi ( talk • contribs) 10:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
The section on interactive segmentation reads like an advertisement for a certain lab/academic and not a general method. I think this page would be improved if this section were deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomhallward ( talk • contribs) 02:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)