This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
In 1970, WILL-TV provided some of its programming to ABC affiliate
WJJY-TV in
Jacksonville, as a public service measure. WJJY would fold in
1971. In 1983, channel 14 would return to the airwaves, as PBS station
WSEC.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you
provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as
trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. -
Tbsdy lives (formerly
Ta bu shi da yu) talk09:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Why would you think Mvcg66b3r is affiliated? Also, "find another project"? Is that an invitation to leave Wikipedia? It doesn't sound very nice. What's all this about? --
Closeapple (
talk)
20:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose so far —
WP:WHENSPLIT (which is informational) reminds us that both article size and notability should be considerations for splitting. This article is still nearly stub size even without splitting: 15,500 characters wiki, maybe 4500 characters of prose; I seem to be the only one to have even added any substantial content in the last few years. None of the stations have joined or left; it's always been a single operation with a shared history, and shares one main website that clearly treats WILL/Illinois Public Media as a single operation. The organization (not one radio station or the other) helped found
National Public Radio.
WP:BROADCAST (an explanatory page) says that full-power broadcast stations are "presumed" notable, but sister stations with the same branding are questionable. Presumed notability is not inherent notability, and special situations always pop up; this seems to be one of those situations. The only subtopic that has its own article is
Prairie Fire (TV series). --
Closeapple (
talk)
20:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose This isn't a state network; all three sections just don't have the breakout potential to survive as stubs alone and each station is intrinsically linked to the other. There's no bloat in the article, which would usually throw me towards a keep, but I'm just not seeing it. Nate•(
chatter)02:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Support with a caveat I think the television station could be broken out into a separate article from the radio stations, but it would necessitate expansion of the content in the existing section on the WILL-TV with appropriate citations if any are available.
TVTonightOKC (
talk)
14:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Support split. Each station airs its own programming, separate from the others, and has a long history that while connected to the other stations is nonetheless distinct. There is plenty of potential for expanding the coverage of each individual station.--
Tdl1060 (
talk)
23:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Support split and Support Tvtonightokc's caveat: See no reason why these stations couldn't have seperate articles of their own...and why they haven't already. -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 16:55 on August 16, 2019 (UTC)
I see discussion above about "no reason why they couldn't" or a non-specific "potential" but those don't really meet the criteria, especially for subjects that are already covered in an existing article like this. I don't see any affirmative evidence of existing content that would result in a full article per
WP:PAGEDECIDE rather than a permastub. A "long history that ... is nontheless distinct" might be at least partial evidence — if it existed in tangible form. Where is it, then? I'd like anyone to demonstrate a substantial, verifiable addition to this article that is clearly only related to one of the three stations and isn't (1) a recitation of the infobox, transmitter or license parameters, (2) cruft that we usually don't allow in well-edited articles (e.g. season schedules, milestone lists), or (3) boilerplate (like those digital TV transition dates that every U.S. TV station article has pasted in with fill-in-the-blank). --
Closeapple (
talk)
07:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Support split I have added information for all three stations, which I believe is sufficient to make it desirable for each station to now have its own page.--
Thomas H. White (
talk)
20:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Split tentatively planned for tomorrow I believe that all of the outstanding concerns have been addressed, so unless someone objects I plan to split the current
WILL page into four parts tomorrow. This will consist of:
1) Transfer the AM station information from
WILL to
WILL (AM), and convert
WILL (AM) from a redirect toward
WILL into a standard page.
2) Transfer the FM station information from
WILL to
WILL-FM, and convert
WILL-FM from a redirect toward
WILL into a standard page.
3) Transfer the TV station information from
WILL to
WILL-TV, and convert
WILL-TV from a redirect toward
WILL into a standard page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
In 1970, WILL-TV provided some of its programming to ABC affiliate
WJJY-TV in
Jacksonville, as a public service measure. WJJY would fold in
1971. In 1983, channel 14 would return to the airwaves, as PBS station
WSEC.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you
provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as
trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. -
Tbsdy lives (formerly
Ta bu shi da yu) talk09:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Why would you think Mvcg66b3r is affiliated? Also, "find another project"? Is that an invitation to leave Wikipedia? It doesn't sound very nice. What's all this about? --
Closeapple (
talk)
20:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose so far —
WP:WHENSPLIT (which is informational) reminds us that both article size and notability should be considerations for splitting. This article is still nearly stub size even without splitting: 15,500 characters wiki, maybe 4500 characters of prose; I seem to be the only one to have even added any substantial content in the last few years. None of the stations have joined or left; it's always been a single operation with a shared history, and shares one main website that clearly treats WILL/Illinois Public Media as a single operation. The organization (not one radio station or the other) helped found
National Public Radio.
WP:BROADCAST (an explanatory page) says that full-power broadcast stations are "presumed" notable, but sister stations with the same branding are questionable. Presumed notability is not inherent notability, and special situations always pop up; this seems to be one of those situations. The only subtopic that has its own article is
Prairie Fire (TV series). --
Closeapple (
talk)
20:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose This isn't a state network; all three sections just don't have the breakout potential to survive as stubs alone and each station is intrinsically linked to the other. There's no bloat in the article, which would usually throw me towards a keep, but I'm just not seeing it. Nate•(
chatter)02:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Support with a caveat I think the television station could be broken out into a separate article from the radio stations, but it would necessitate expansion of the content in the existing section on the WILL-TV with appropriate citations if any are available.
TVTonightOKC (
talk)
14:22, 19 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Support split. Each station airs its own programming, separate from the others, and has a long history that while connected to the other stations is nonetheless distinct. There is plenty of potential for expanding the coverage of each individual station.--
Tdl1060 (
talk)
23:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Support split and Support Tvtonightokc's caveat: See no reason why these stations couldn't have seperate articles of their own...and why they haven't already. -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 16:55 on August 16, 2019 (UTC)
I see discussion above about "no reason why they couldn't" or a non-specific "potential" but those don't really meet the criteria, especially for subjects that are already covered in an existing article like this. I don't see any affirmative evidence of existing content that would result in a full article per
WP:PAGEDECIDE rather than a permastub. A "long history that ... is nontheless distinct" might be at least partial evidence — if it existed in tangible form. Where is it, then? I'd like anyone to demonstrate a substantial, verifiable addition to this article that is clearly only related to one of the three stations and isn't (1) a recitation of the infobox, transmitter or license parameters, (2) cruft that we usually don't allow in well-edited articles (e.g. season schedules, milestone lists), or (3) boilerplate (like those digital TV transition dates that every U.S. TV station article has pasted in with fill-in-the-blank). --
Closeapple (
talk)
07:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Support split I have added information for all three stations, which I believe is sufficient to make it desirable for each station to now have its own page.--
Thomas H. White (
talk)
20:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Split tentatively planned for tomorrow I believe that all of the outstanding concerns have been addressed, so unless someone objects I plan to split the current
WILL page into four parts tomorrow. This will consist of:
1) Transfer the AM station information from
WILL to
WILL (AM), and convert
WILL (AM) from a redirect toward
WILL into a standard page.
2) Transfer the FM station information from
WILL to
WILL-FM, and convert
WILL-FM from a redirect toward
WILL into a standard page.
3) Transfer the TV station information from
WILL to
WILL-TV, and convert
WILL-TV from a redirect toward
WILL into a standard page.